Where we stand‎ > ‎

Media Releases

These are the Media releases recently issued by the Union and other organisations/people..


posted 4 Apr 2018, 11:01 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 4 Apr 2018, 11:07 ]

The National Workers Union issued the following statement on April 4th 2018.

Working people and the poor in T&T are faced with more and more pressure as the government seeks to make up for the tremendous loss in revenue from the energy companies (from $20 billion to $1 billion), by picking the pockets of those who could least afford to suffer a drop in income.

The National Workers Union (NWU) alerts the population to the move by the government to raise utility rates, more particularly to raise rates charged by the Water and Sewerage Authority (WASA). Along with increase in water rates the intention is to, once again, eliminate jobs at the public utility.

At the Joint Select Committee of Parliament on 28th March 2018, WASA Chairman Romney Thomas lamented that rates were “unusually low”, which was one of the reasons for lack of profitability. He also argues that higher costs and low tariffs mean that there are less funds for investment. WASA officials also argued that the intention was to transform WASA to operate independent of subventions.

WASA argues that water usage is “excessive” because it is cheap and actually leads to higher costs for WASA. They didn’t add that one third of WASA’s production does not reach the consumer, but is allowed to leak all over the place, though they did admit that only 20 percent of homes receive pipe-borne water every day. This figure is at variance with Minister Le Hunte’s figure of 38%.

In addition to subsidising WASA to the tune of $3billion per year, citizens, who can afford it, have had to install water tanks and now those who can afford and those who can’t are being made to pay increased rates.

This same WASA has become a happy hunting ground for contractors and suppliers. This is how the financiers, suppliers, contractors, friends and families of the politicians thrive. Corruption is the lifeblood of the economic system in T&T.

This is the same WASA that hires private contractors to make 47,000 truck borne deliveries per year at a cost of $18,800,000 and some of these contractors turn around and put a surcharge on consumers. This is the same WASA that gave a consultant a US$70,000 contract to prepare a business plan to submit to the Regulated Industries Commission (RIC) because it did not have the competence to do it in house!

This is the same WASA that signed an agreement valued at US$594,280 ($3,833,106) with Spanish firm Aquagest Solutions (a subsidiary of Agbar), for the provision of consultancy services for the design, preparation and presentation of an operational transformation plan for the utility.

WASA has also entered into an agreement with a Ugandan firm at a cost of US$309,325 for the development of a performance improvement plan for WASA that includes staff training, development of a decentralisation strategy and the development of successor annual plans. Everybody benefits from by feeding on WASA, like corbeaus on a corpse, except working people and the poor.

So, in addition to the hefty subsidy, the spending of money on water tanks, the overpaying of corrupt contracts, we now are going to be forced to pay increased water rates. Don’t forget that WASA has taken loans to the tune of US$600,000,000 from the Inter American Development Bank (IDB) for the Waste Water Rehabilitation Project which citizens also have to pay back.

Dr. James Lee Young, Chairman of the Regulated Industries Commission, former head of the Energy Chamber wants WASA to eliminate jobs.
James Lee Young, Executive Director of the Regulated Industries Commission (RIC) to which WASA must apply for a rate increase, told the JSC that WASA has a poor rating for efficiency. He defines efficiency not as WASA’s ability to supply a safe and reliable supply of pipe-borne water but in the number of employees per thousand connections. He claims WASA has 12-13 employees per thousand connections and that top companies have 3-4 employees per thousand connections.

What Lee Young is doing is setting the stage for implementing the conditionalities contained in the IDB loan. US$50 million of the loan is for the re-organization of WASA. According to the IDB, the plan is to “decrease the number of employee per 1,000 connections from 12.5 in 2011 to 5.8 in 2016.” This means that more than half of WASA’s workforce in 2011 was supposed to have been eliminated by 2016.

According to the Program annex to the loan “2.03 …The activities financed through this component will include: (i) support to the implementation of transformational actions concerning the organizational structure, financing voluntary selection separation plans; and (ii) voluntary vocational training for employees accepting the separation plan.”

The loan proposal states “the economic regulator has issued a new methodology that will allow WASA to update its tariffs; and WASA’s Board has approved a strategic plan to transform WASA into an autonomous commercially run company with a strong corporate governance.”

This is a clear signal that when WASA applies to the RIC for a rate increase, a major consideration by the RIC is going to be how many workers per connection does WASA have? With the Rowley government pushing the envelope because we ent riot yet, it is clear that the government intends to implement the conditionalities contained in the contracts with the IDB.

Working people and the poor must not allow this further burden to be placed on our shoulders in addition to their plans to raise electricity rates and to sell as much of the publicly owned assets as they can.

The National Workers Union urges community organisations, trade unions, non-governmental organisations, professional groups and citizens at large to organise themselves to prevent the increase of utility rates. It can be done with co-ordination and unity. It is high time that the working people and the poor take direct action to protect and defend their interests and stop expecting sell out politicians and confidence tricksters to do so.

- END -


Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer – Cell: 785-7637


posted 28 Mar 2018, 11:29 by Gerry Kangalee

The National Workers Union (NWU) expresses its bewilderment and disgust at the position adopted by the government of Trinidad and Tobago in opposing the request by the government of the Commonwealth of Dominica to waive membership dues of the Organisation of American States (OAS) for two years because of the difficult situation in which Dominica finds itself in the aftermath of the massive destruction suffered by our Caribbean neighbour from Hurricane Maria.

The NWU is bewildered because this is the same government that extended assistance in the immediate wake of the hurricane and offered sanctuary and school places to Dominicans. The NWU is disgusted because this unexplained action by the government will surely enhance the image of Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean as one of arrogance and fecklessness.

The National Workers Union calls upon the government to explain its stance in this matter, being the only country to oppose Dominica’s request. We wish to point out that when it comes to foreign policy, government (of which ever political party) and the present invisible foreign minister seem to believe that citizens have no right to consultation, information or explanation as to what our country’s stance should be on foreign policy issues or why the government adopts particular positions. The craven abstention of the government on the United Nations vote censuring the USA for its recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel springs to mind.

Government seems to subscribe to the view that it is the only entity that should have access to information that could be critical to the present and future well-being of the citizens of Trinidad and Tobago. The much touted concepts of transparency and accountability go out of the window, it seems, when it comes to foreign policy.

The NWU reminds that nation that on 2013-06-04, the we called upon the government to publish the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) it signed with the United States in May 2013, which by all accounts would have given the United States armed forces extraordinary privileges in Trinidad and Tobago, a worrying development given the USA’s military threats and aggression toward Venezuela.

We wish to further remind the population that on 2013-09-24 the NWU called upon the government to publish the memorandum of agreement between the governments of T&T and Venezuela concerning the Loran Manatee gas field. They have never done so.

It is time that the veil is removed and the government take the citizenry into its confidence on foreign policy issues, which in many respects are as critical to our survival as domestic policy positions. There is no better time to do so than now, by explaining the thinking behind the government’s stance on Dominica’s request.


posted 22 Mar 2018, 11:05 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 22 Mar 2018, 11:06 ]

The following media release was issued on March 16th by Pan-African Unity Dialogue, based in New York.  It is titled Pan-African Unity Dialogue in Solidarity with the People of Barbuda; Efforts Underway to Prevent a “Land Grab” by Actor Robert DeNiro. The group's contact is Don Rojas donrojas636@gmail.com Tel: 410-844-1031.

The Pan-African Unity Dialogue (PAUD), a regular forum of African diaspora organizations in the New York metro area, is expressing support and solidarity with the people of Barbuda as they struggle against a land grab being orchestrated by movie actor and real estate developer Robert De Niro in collusion with the current government of Prime Minister Gaston Browne. 

In addition, PAUD is calling for a #Shame on You De Niro Twitter campaign to draw public attention to this egregious situation and to pressure both DeNiro and the Browne government to cease with this greedy land acquisition and to fully respect the democratic rights that the residents of Barbuda had enjoyed before Hurricane Irma devastated the island in September last year. 

“DeNiro represents a face that stands for an array of wealthy investors who fail to be sensitive to the history and traditions of participatory democracy practiced by Barbudans before staking a claim to their paradise,” said Dr. Ron Daniels, Convener of PAUD and President of the Institute of the Black World 21st Century.

Recently, a backroom deal was hatched between the Gaston Browne government and DeNiro and his investor partners that would exploit the horrific damage Barbuda faced in the wake of Hurricane’s Irma’s devastation of the island which resulted in 90% damage to buildings and infrastructure and to the evacuation of all 1800 residents of Barbuda to Antigua. To date, about 400 residents have returned to the 62 square mile island that the Washington Post described as a “forgotten Eden.”

On December 12, just a few weeks after the hurricane struck Barbuda, a sweeping 13-page “amendment” to the hard-won Barbuda Land Act was officially introduced in Antigua and Barbuda’s House of Representatives. It includes changes that entirely reverse the meaning of the law.

In the amendment, a clause declaring Barbuda “owned in common by the people of Barbuda” was deleted and replaced. “The fundamental purpose of the Act is to grant to Barbudans the right to purchase the [land],” the amended act reads.

To add salt to the wound, the amendment also altered the definition of a Barbudan, eliminating those whose grandparents lived on the island. With the law’s passage, a swath of the Barbudan diaspora’s claims to the land were erased.

Days after the Barbuda Land Act amendment passed in the Antigua & Barbuda

Parliament, the Clinton Foundation and the Rocky Mountain Institute announced, unbeknown to the Barbuda Council members, “a new effort to redesign Barbuda’s power sector and to shift to a renewable energy model.”

Members of ‘Barbuda Silent No More’ filed a request for an injunction, calling the amendment illegal. But a judge denied the injunction,
Robert De Niro
and last month, the amendment to the land law was approved and signed by the governor general.

The deal would change the island’s communal land ownership law in the interest of developers and particularly DeNiro who has plans to build a luxury resort on Barbuda called ‘Paradise Found Nobu’. The resort is to be built on 555 acres of land leased to DeNiro for 178 Years, for just $6.2 million, plus an array of tax benefits.

PM Browne has declared DeNiro an official “economic envoy” of the Government of Antigua and Barbuda.

However, a large number of Barbudans including a majority living in diaspora communities in New York, Atlanta and Toronto regard DeNiro, not as an envoy but more as a predator who’s playing a role of disaster capitalist in the Caribbean.

“Invariably, such investors get their hands on virgin land, cheap or at no price. They then turn around and sell these lands as luxury properties for the rich and famous and make a quick profit with huge returns….getting a big name attached to your venture is seen as a way of selling to the clientele,” said a member of the ‘Barbuda Silent No More’ group.

There are painful historical echoes in this series of events. Barbuda’s history is sparsely documented, but according to residents, the special land law has its roots in 1834, when a pitched conflict erupted in response to an attempt to forcibly relocate newly emancipated slaves in Barbuda to plantations in Antigua so that a slave owner, Sir Christopher Bethell-Codrington, could collect compensation for his lost “property” from the British Crown.

The Barbudan slaves refused to move, preferring to stay on the land and waters where they had long raised animals, farmed, and fished. After a failed attempt to quash the resistance by British forces, the freed slaves eventually gained control over the land on their island.

Indeed, on the land where they had been slaves, Barbudans created a democratic, communal ownership structure, which they have fiercely protected for almost two centuries. Land in Barbuda could not be bought and sold willy nilly to rich and powerful developers. The island ran like a co-op with decisions about land use driven by an elected council and approvals for major developments going to a general vote.

Tiny as it was in numbers, pre-Hurricane Barbudan society offered the Caribbean and the black world, more broadly, a rare example of participatory economic planning and communal land distribution to freed slaves and their descendants from emancipation in 1834 down through the generations to the present. The steep social and economic inequalities that are a fact of life across the Caribbean did not exist in Barbuda. The ocean provides food security, and any Barbudan could claim occupancy of beachfront property.

“The Pan African Unity Dialogue is demanding that Barbudans be given the right by the central government in Antigua to return to their island without hindrance and to re-settle their ancestral lands and resume building Barbuda as a fine example of sustainable, people-centered, democratic development in the Caribbean, ” said Dr. Daniels.

Some Barbudans are calling on DeNiro to express support for the will and desire of Barbudans to maintain their communal land ownership. They concede that his project could still proceed but it would require the consent of the community.

For many Barbudans, recovery from Hurricane Irma has not been “a just recovery.” They cite as a bitter irony that Barbudans with their history of participatory democracy and careful land use practices had all of these rights before the hurricane struck. And now, dispersed from their homes after Irma, they are in the midst of losing them. 


posted 20 Feb 2018, 13:22 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 20 Feb 2018, 13:27 ]

The following statement was released on February 20th 2018.

Image result for bigwu logoThe National Workers Union (NWU), categorically and unreservedly condemns the
Watson Duke
action of the President of the Public Services Association (PSA) and the National Trade Union Centre (NATUC), in dismissing eight workers employed by the PSA for wearing jerseys of the Banking Insurance and General Workers Union (BIGWU), the union to which they belong.

This dastardly action on the part of the president of the PSA and NATUC is without precedent in the annals of trade unionism in T&T. It is mind boggling that a trade union leader would so wantonly violate the rights of trade union members to peaceful protest and to engage in such blatant victimisation of workers for engaging in traditional trade union activities. This is illegal under the labour laws of T&T.

It is significant to note that among those dismissed are the President, Vice President and Secretary of the BIGWU branch of the PSA staff and two of the workers who were engaged in compiling a new PSA voters’ list as ordered by the High Court.

The employers must be rubbing their hands in glee and raising their glasses in a toast to what can only be considered their fifth columnist in the trade union movement. The irony is that employers have accepted over the years that union members are within their right to wear their union jerseys on the workplace, but here we have a trade union leader dismissing workers for engaging in a practice which has been engaged in by the very members of the PSA from time to time.

Watson Duke’s horrifying action, while disgusting in the extreme, should come as no surprise, since this is not the first time he has dismissed PSA staff members. At least nine such dismissals have been deemed by the court to be unlawful.

The National Workers Union urges the leadership of the PSA to immediately re-instate the dismissed workers.

The National Workers Union calls upon members of the PSA to make it crystal clear that they stand for justice and the right to union representation by calling upon Watson Duke to resign immediately as President of their long-standing organisation.

The National Workers Union calls upon all trade union leaders to condemn strongly this attack on the heart of trade unionism inflicted by one of their own and to make it clear that such a person has no place in the business of defending, protecting and advancing the interests of workers which is the raison d’être of the trade union movement.

The National Workers Union calls upon the National Trade Union Centre to condemn this gross violation of trade union principle and to call for the immediate re-instatement of the dismissed workers and move quickly to initiate proceedings for the removal of Watson Duke from his position as president of NATUC.

The National Workers Union calls upon the Joint Trade Union Movement (JTUM), of which BIGWU is a member, to stand in solidarity with the dismissed workers and their union and to render whatever assistance they may deem fit to the workers.

The National Workers Union stands in solidarity with the dismissed workers and with the Banking Insurance and General Workers Union as they seek to ensure that this gross perversion of justice is rectified.


Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)


posted 24 Jan 2018, 07:05 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 24 Jan 2018, 07:22 ]

Ida Le Blanc
The National Union of Domestic Employees (NUDE) supplied the following document as preliminary comments to the joint select committee on finance and legal affairs. It is entitled AN ENQUIRY INTO CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL INSURANCE SYSTEM IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO dated January 12th 2018 and signed by General Secretary Ida Le Blanc.

On the request of the committee it deals with the extent to which employers of domestic employees in Trinidad and Tobago fulfill their responsibilities as per the national insurance act. It also deals with the potential implications of an increase in the retirement age on workers and the performance of the National Insurance Board in distributing benefits to employees under the union`s remit.


The National Union of Domestic Employees (NUDE) was registered as a trade union in December, 1982 under the Registration of Trade Union Act. The union organizes domestic workers, who work as cleaners, cooks, housekeepers, caregivers, handymen, drivers, ironers, gardeners, who work in private residences.

They complained that they worked without contracts so their duties would be changed unilaterally by the employer and they are expected to perform additional duties that was not agreed to when they first started the job, low wages and the non existence of paid vacation leave and overtime payment, they are also not paid for statutory Public Holidays when it falls on their work day. Sleep In domestic workers are always on call and they are expected to work `round the clock when they are hired to do care-giving work.

Sleep In Domestic Workers complain that they are always on call and the National Insurance is not paid on their behalf. They are not registered in some instances and when they enquire from the National Insurance they are fired and they have no means of recourse
under labour legislation because they are not considered as workers under the Industrial Relations Act (IRA).

This action by the employer denies them the right to benefits that other workers enjoy, sickness, injury, pension, etc. They sometimes have to work under poor and abusive working conditions and when they are injured they are unable to access the National Insurance injury benefits nor compensation under the Workmen Compensation neither can they access the Occupational Safety and Health Act for redress. Frequently when they are injured on the job they are fired and have no means of recourse under the Industrial Relations Act and if they were not registered under the National Insurance System they cannot access social security benefits as other workers. Where live-in workers are fired without notice, they are left homeless, especially in the case of migrant domestic workers.

In 1992 NUDE expanded its membership to include general workers to concentrate on organising workers in the informal sector into the union, persons who work as drivers, janitors, bartenders, loaders, waitresses, store clerks, merchandisers, production workers, quarry workers etc.

Their complaints were no different to the domestic workers the only difference is that they are considered workers and the union can seek recourse on their behalf in matters of wrongful dismissal claims and any other trade dispute that may arise.

According to the International Labour Organization (ILO) the provision of social protection is an effective and important means of reducing poverty and social exclusion as it prevents people from falling into poverty and enables the poor to escape the poverty trap. In the absence of social protection, people, especially the most vulnerable, are subjected to increased risks of sinking below the poverty line or remaining caught in conditions of poverty.

The biggest problem for our members with the system is the registration of domestic workers and low income workers in the informal sector and the payment of their contributions to the NIB, some employers deduct contributions from the workers` salary but never pay the required contributions to the NIB. Some employers tell them they are paying the contributions but they never do.

They only become aware of this when they seek out the benefits, whether it is injury, sickness or maternity benefits. Sometimes it is when they apply for their pension then they realise the amount of contributions missing even though it was deducted from their salary. The NIB officer will then ask the worker for proof that she/he worked with the person in the case of the domestic worker or the company with other workers.

When domestic workers proceed on sick leave which they are entitled to under the Household Assistant Order (Minimum Wages Act) once they have been continuously employed for a period of at least six months and once they produce a sick leave when leave is taken in excess of two days. They are entitled to two weeks sick leave paid by the NIB and the employer.

But if the worker was not registered with NIB which is the employer`s responsibility to register them and pay the contributions that were deducted from their salary with their corresponding contribution to the NIB, to enable workers to access their benefits under the system as all other workers. The same happens with the other benefits such as maternity, injury etc.

Domestic workers are frequently not given a formal written contract which is a provision of the Minimum Wages (Household Assistant) Order set out in section 10 which states the duties, hours of work and rest periods of every household assistant shall be clearly set out in writing by his employer when the household assistant first assumes duties. This written information by the employer could be used as evidence that you worked with the employer but that is never done so domestic workers has no proof of working with the employer. There is no effective monitoring system to ensure that employers abide by the law.


Most workers look forward to their pension from NIS when they reach the age of 60. Domestic workers are preparing and awaiting with anticipation to reach the age 60 to receive their pension, because of some of the arduous tasks they have been performing for years, which becomes more difficult to perform as they age and the work itself is bad for the domestic workers` health after the age of 60.

Some domestic workers have made domestic work a lifetime occupation and performing these jobs for years especially ironing, lifting and moving around furniture, taking care of the children, elderly and disabled lifting and turning the aged and disabled has its effects around 60. That is when ailments start affecting workers who do these jobs, this is arduous work.

The trend across the world is to increase the retirement age to deal with the ageing population (especially the baby boomers generation) and the pressure this is putting on old age pension schemes. However, the Convention 128 on invalidity, old age and survivors benefit convention contains a provision that says that certain categories of workers should be treated differently and allowed a different retirement age because of their type of work.

Art 15 (3) of the convention says 'If the prescribed age is 65 years or higher, the age shall be lowered, under prescribed conditions, in respect of persons who have been engaged in occupations that are deemed by national legislation, for the purpose of old-age benefit, to be arduous or unhealthy.'

However we all know that pension reform is inevitable. Therefore we suggest a formalization policy to get more workers paying National Insurance before taking action to increase the age, we need a pension reform bringing all the stakeholders together to have a national dialogue.

The ILO has well researched the issue of social protection for all in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) which states in SDG-1.3: Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable”

National Insurance is only deducted when you work in continuous service, if a domestic worker was to get a job at a private residence you cannot pay for her if she comes in once in a while, or when needed, which may be once over a long period if their expertise is house cleaning. After one month employers have to notify the NIB if the worker no longer works with you if NIS is not paid on the workers behalf, so they are left out of the system. These workers who may work in different homes on a “when needed basis” NIS is not paid on their behalf, all these workers should be picked up in the system.

The National Union of Domestic Employees (NUDE) conceptualized The Service Workers Centre Co-operative in its venture to formalize domestic work to ensure domestic workers are registered with National Insurance and contributions paid on their behalf, the formation of the co-op was a natural progression to address these issues and other issues of abuse and poor working conditions.

Twenty five members of NUDE who are domestic workers, caregivers, ironers and those other workers who have experience in domestic work came together and formed the Co-operative, to offer services in care. The maintenance of the private homes and small establishments, caring for the elderly, disabled and children in private homes our membership is made up of women and men willing to work together towards getting a decent life for themselves. They expect in the future to open their own home for the elderly.

We recommend a simplified scheme for small contributors or difficult to cover groups, NUDE, The Service Workers Co-operative and other organisations like the maxi taxi association, the taxi association, farmers, etc can work as Intermediaries of The National Insurance Board to bring on more contributors.

NUDE is suggesting that the government look into the use of the Service Vouchers as a simplified scheme which is ongoing in France, Belgium and the canton of Geneva. According to Samuel Grumiau, a free lance journalist specialized in international labour issues in his report prepared for the ILO Bureau for Workers` activities (ACTRAV) on formalizing domestic work through the use of service vouchers.

He said, all over the world, a large proportion of domestic workers remain in the informal economy and this prevents them from fully enjoying all rights enshrined in these new standards. Various countries and regions have set up service voucher to help domestic workers to emerge from the informal economy by easing the administrative burdens on the private citizens who wish to employ them. This report briefly describes how schemes of this kind have been put in place in France, Belgium, and the Swiss canton of Geneva, three places that they work particularly well.

NUDE is recommending the Service Vouchers for domestic workers who work on an irregular basis, this in no way is advocating for a change in the registering and paying for full time and part time domestic workers into the National Insurance System. It could be used for street vendors, farmers, and other workers who are left out the system. All this should be implemented with much needed quality service. This will also include many other workers in the system, workers who are marginalized and are denied the right to social protection. Hiding employers will become visible to engage in formal agreement with difficult to cover workers. The system must also combat fraud and corruption.


Workers who are unable to read and write complain that they receive no assistance from NIB in filling out the complaint form and the request for contribution statement; if the union representative tries to assist we are told by NIB that we are not the insured person.

They complain about the length of time they have to wait when a complaint is made against the employer, the investigation stays too long leaving the worker despondent, having negative things to say. There should be more transparency and communication.

The contribution statement should have the employer`s name to enable workers to keep their own records over time, especially important in preparing for retirement.

When workers apply for pension benefits and they are “sent up and down” as they say seeking information on their past employment which may be forty years ago, they end up leaving frustrated and fed up and discontinue the process to access the benefit.


1. A Reform Commission should be set up with the stakeholders, inclusive of trade union, employers, civil society, government, NIB, to discuss the way forward in a positive, peaceful and meaningful way that will preserve the right to pension.

2. Rigorous campaign to encourage employers to register workers and capture unpaid national insurance contributions from employers, especially in the case that they have deducted contributions from the workers` wages.

3. Efficient and effective solutions to deal with complaints.

4. Make it mandatory to give payslips to workers.

5. Follow the Uruguay model that produces a book in school for students and teachers to inform about responsibilities and obligations under the social security system.

6. Awareness/sensitization exercise towards changing the mindset towards National Insurance

7. Capacity Development Training

8. Transparency is needed for workers who are contributors


posted 18 Jun 2017, 20:05 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 18 Jun 2017, 20:14 ]

The following statement was issued by the National Workers Union (NWU) on June 19th 2017:

June 19th 2017 marks the eightieth anniversary of the General Strike and Insurrection that gave birth to the trade union movement. This is truly an event worth celebrating and the National Workers Union salutes all who gather in historic Fyzabad to pay tribute to the working class fighters of 1937.

The employers and the ruling elites who control and manipulate the confidence tricksters and hustlers called politicians. are determined to make the workers pay for the capitalist crisis so that the parasites could continue to live high off the hog and continue to wallow in the mud of corruption and feed at the trough of public funds.

We see the wave of divestments, attempts at privatisation, the shift toward private medical care at the expense of the public health system, the downsizing of the public service, wage freezes, attacks on social benefits, the gutting of GATE, the entrenching of contract labour, subsidies for transnational corporations, increased taxation, removal of fuel subsidy, mass retrenchments and a growing inequality between the tiny elite at the top and the rest of society.

They are attacking workers pensions, both the NIS and occupational pension plans. They want us to wuk and dead by increasing the retirement age, increasing workers’ contributions and reducing employers’ contributions. The employers are resorting to the Appeal Court to overturn decisions of the Recognition Board. They are appealing against awards of the Industrial Court and in many cases simply refusing to implement court awards.

Thousands of workers have lost their jobs and thousands more are at risk as the employers led by the State, exhort the workers to sacrifice in the “national interest” while they give back billions of dollars to BP, play the arse with the twenty something billion dollars Duprey debt and seek ways to eliminate thousands of jobs at Petrotrin.

Some of the companies that have gotten rid of workers or are in the process of doing so are: Arcelor Mittal without a
single cent in severance pay; CENTRIN; RBC; OAS; CCN; Guardian Media Ltd., Industrial Plant Service Limited; Government Human Resource Services; Caroni Green; GISL; Atlantic LNG and many more.

While the employers and the state have clearly and openly declared war on the working people, many of our trade union leaders are holding on tightly to the coat tails of the corrupt race-based political parties. Our leaders signing declarations and MOUs with whatever corrupt political party is in office, while our people losing their jobs by the thousands. THIS NONSENSE HAS TO STOP!

It is time that working people organise ourselves to launch a fightback against those who are consigning our families to a life of hardship so they could prop up their system of profit maximisation and looting of public funds. The united trade unions must initiate that fightback.

This unity must go far beyond marching together in Fyzabad. We have heard and seen it so many times before and we will believe it when we see unity around a campaign based on utilising the power of numbers and our power over production. That is the strength of the trade union movement!

We have attended all the consultations, submitted numerous documents outlining our position on amendments to labour laws, did research and argued till we turn blue, but they do not take us on. Why? Because they consider the trade union movement’s leadership to be a bunch of blowhards, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Union members must let the leadership know that if the strength of our arguments is having little effect, then we must demonstrate the argument of our strength which is the power of numbers and our power over production.

Trade union leaders must realise that the struggle is not about them and their public posturing and petty political intrigues. It is about protecting, maintaining and defending workers’ interests; living, breathing human beings with children to send to school and grandparents to mind. We are struggling to survive in a hostile economic, social, political and security environment. Talking unity is one thing...the taste of the pudding is in the eating!

We are being emasculated as workers and we are being put under serious stress as citizens of a country where the bigger gangs control the government and the police and the smaller gangs control the streets. The trade union leaders must do less talking and more listening. They must listen to what the workers are saying. They must be as accountable to their members and to working people just as they want government to be accountable to the citizens. If we want the Workers Agenda implemented, we must engage in a sustained campaign of mass mobilisation not only of our members but also the unorganised working people.

Mobilisation cannot be done through the media. The workers must be involved at the branch, workplace, mass membership meetings, COSSABO and at community levels. The situation must be discussed thoroughly with the members and the community and guidance must be sought from them as to what they are prepared to do and when they are prepared to do it.

The country is in a deep crisis. The institutions of authority and control have all crumbled: government, police, judiciary, church. Bandits, money launderers and thieves are jostling for control. There needs to be trade union unity in deed and not in talk, so that working people can secure our interests in the midst of all the mayhem and the madness. Trade union unity must not be a unity of leaders. It must be unity in action.

We must initiate dialogue with people’s organisations in the communities and those which represent particular interests be they ecological, cultural, or issue-based. We must review the lessons of March 1989, the day of resistance, when the trade unions were divided organisationally, but united in action and shut the country down.

This is not about Roget or Annisette or Lambert or Cabrera. This is about hundreds of thousands of working people and their families - whether they continue to be treated as people of no consequence or whether they push back against the assault on their quality of life and create some breathing space for themselves as we fight to survive in a crumbling capitalist system.

Trade union leaders must recognise that their place is with their members and not with the race-based political parties which promise paradise but deliver hell on earth. Failure to recognise this means that when push come to shove, they will be seen by their own members as no different to the exploiters and will be treated as such!




posted 22 May 2017, 12:28 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 22 May 2017, 12:51 ]

The following statement, dated 2017/05/22, was issued by the National Workers Union.

The National Workers Union (NWU) condemns the disrespectful and contemptuous way the Ministry of Health has organised its so-called “consultations” on the Welch report which was set up in November 2015 to review the health care system.

The Welch Committee was set up to:

i.To audit the current manner of operation of the Regional Health Authorities (RHAs) and its ability to provide quality health care.

ii. To rationalise the system(s) and framework governing doctors who pursue private practice while employed in a public institution.

The report dealing with the RHAs was submitted on August 29th 2016. Up to today the full report has not been published. The Ministry of Health’s website has published thirty eight recommendations from the report, but without being aware of the reasoning behind the recommendations, it is exceedingly difficult to pronounce one way or the other on the recommendations, which makes the consultations nothing but a farce.

None of the recommendations deal with the horrendous industrial relations environment that plagues the health sector and which if not resolved will militate against any upgrade in the quality of health care available to the population.

None of the recommendations deal with the ridiculous dual system of job appointments (Board-approved and cabinet-approved) which is the doorway to nepotism in hiring practices at all levels and which inflict political hacks with no expertise in leading management positions. This is the foundation of the short term contract system which sees workers who have been employed for fifteen years still on short term one year and two year contacts. Some workers are on month to month contracts.

As the National Workers Union stated in its memorandum to the Welch committee dated 2016/02/16 (which may be downloaded at the the bottom of this page): “... some categories of permanent staff that are offered promotions are told that they have to resign their positions and go on short term contracts to accept the promotion. This horrendous contract system affects both workers with professional qualifications and those without. Short term contract workers obviously suffer anxiety over their job security, are at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing mortgage and other loans and credit facilities.

They cannot properly plan the future of their families or make significant investments and they are not entitled to be members of the Regional Health Authorities’ Pension Plan. Even if they eventually become “permanent” and eligible to join the Pension Plan, the service they had before they became permanent would not be counted as service in the plan.”

There are many other industrial relations infractions which occur and which would not be tolerated in a unionised environment. Some of them include gross manipulation of the shift system to rob workers of their entitlements, the use of performance appraisals as a tool of victimisation, the lack of urgency in filling the thousands of staff shortages. In effect, the relationship between employees and management does not reflect modern industrial relations practice, but instead is reminiscent of the master and servant relationship which is supposed to be extinct, but which survives in many non-unionised workplaces.

The Welch Report (PART1B) dealing with the issue of public sector doctors in private practice is available on the Ministry of Health’s website. The Committee was unable to agree on a unified position. The majority supporting the abolition of private practice for public health care professionals. This position is supported by the National Workers Union.

The National Workers Union urges the Ministry of Health to make the Welch Report (Part 1) available for public scrutiny so that the people who the public health system is designed to serve can make an input into the discussions based on the information gathered and the arguments put forward by the “experts”.

The National Workers Union recognises that the Welch committee is just the latest in a long line of committees that has examined the health care system including the Julien Commission of 1957, the National Advisory Council interim Report of 1978, the Toby Commission Report of 1982, the Gafoor Commission of 2006. We will not be surprised if the recommendations contained in the Welch report go the way of all flesh as has happened with the recommendations of previous reports.

Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)


posted 15 May 2017, 18:25 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 15 May 2017, 18:45 ]

The Communication Workers’ Union, (CWU), would like to publicly express its grave concern with respect to the recent announcement by the Board of Directors of the Telecommunications Services of Trinidad and Tobago Limited, TSTT, about their Share Purchase Agreement with Massy Communications Limited, a Subsidiary of the Massy Holdings Ltd. (Massy).

The Union would like to get some clarity about this situation so that the Union and the citizens of Trinidad and Tobago can be more educated and informed on such a critical development in a very key State Entity.


TSTT Is a State Owned Entity with 49% Minority Shareholder Cable and Wireless. The Government has 51% Shareholding Interest in TSTT. The Government’s 51% Shareholding is vested in the National Enterprise Limited, (NEL), an Investment Holding Company Set up in 1999. NEL has Shares in the following Companies: NFM; NGC NGL; NGC TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LNG; TSTT and TRINGEN.

TSTT has a strong loyal customer base, with a network and plant infrastructure that covers almost the entire geographical space of Trinidad and Tobago. 
In addition, TSTT being the only INDIGENOUS player in the Telecommunications Market for over fifty odd years has developed a cadre of competent, well educated, knowledgeable and experienced personnel in the Telecommunications Business. This is a great asset that cannot be matched or duplicated. 

Massy Communications is a subsidiary of the Massy Holdings Ltd. (Massy). Massy is a publicly listed company, with 7,500 shareholders. 

The owners of the Company include some institutional investors like the NIB, RBC Trust Limited, Republic Bank and the Unit Trust, plus quite a number of individual shareholders inclusive of some Directors of the Company. 

Massy operates in around five different Sectors, Integrated Retail; Automotive and Industrial Equipment; Energy and Industrial Gases; Financial Services and Information Technology and Communications. 

One of Massy’s key business strategies is the pursuit of growth in all Sectors locally, regionally and in the Latin American Territories. 

Massy Communications Limited (Massy Communications) is a Trinidad & Tobago based subsidiary of the Massy Group. Founded in 2006, by the then Neal and Massy ITC Group, Massy Communications has built a next-generation MPLS based network and made significant investments in both submarine and terrestrial fibre optic capacity. 

The vision of the Massy Communications Limited is to be the leader in next generation technology in the telecommunications industry hence its vision statement: “Where Next is Now.” Their philosophy is articulated as: Your Partners, Real People, Sharing your Passion. 

Massy Communications has partners and affiliates operating in over 50 countries of the world, many are some of the world’s finest Tier 1 Telecommunications providers. Massy Communications’ growing fibre optic network enables the Company to provide clients operating in sectors such as Energy, Financial services, International Telecommunications and Government with multiple classes of voice and data services. 

It must be noted that key members of the Massy Holdings Ltd. Board of Directors include Mr. Robert Bermudez, Chairman, who it is alleged has a close relationship with the PNM Government based on the recent UWI, Vice Chancellor fiasco in addition to being a Director of RBC Financial Caribbean Ltd, which is associated to RBC Trust, which is also a leading institutional Shareholder in Massy Holdings Ltd., and Richard Young, Non Executive Director, who is the father of the current Minister in the Office of the Prime Minister, Stuart Young. 

In addition, one of the leading institutional investors in Massy is Republic Bank, which ironically is the same Bank that TSTT raised its Credit Facilities through to facilitate its Strategic Plan. Oh, what a Tangled Web they weave when they seek to Deceive!! 

The Telecommunications Sector in Trinidad and Tobago is considered to be the hub around which the advancement of our economy would revolve. 

TSTT is an Essential Service Provider and as such must have an intrinsic link to the National Developmental thrust. TSTT is very critical to our key national developmental objectives such National Security, Economic Diversification, Social Development, Educational Development, Health Care and Cultural consciousness which the CWU believes must be realised through the State involvement in the Telecommunications Sector. 

Historically, the major beneficiaries from the revenues generated from the Telecommunications Sector are the foreign Multi National Corporations such as Cable and Wireless, Columbus Communications and DIGICEL. The Caribbean region generates about US 5 Billion dollars in revenue in the Telecom Sector annually. 

If we would recall, Cable and Wireless acquired Columbus Communications which had John Malone as one of its main shareholders. 

After that acquisition, John Malone ended up as one of the Major Shareholders of Cable and Wireless and subsequently thereafter, his fully owned Liberty Global, acquired Cable and Wireless. Essentially, meaning that Malone who was bought out by Cable and Wireless, ended up as a major shareholder in Cable and Wireless and then eventually bought out Cable and Wireless, a case of “himself to himself”, or as we put it, ‘CORPORATE PROSTITUTION”. 

It is therefore imperative that the Country and the citizens of Trinidad and Tobago should benefit from such indigenous generated revenues, consistent with the provisions of our Constitution and not corporate raiders such as Malone or local tycoons who does not have the national interest at heart.


TSTT does not have an Executive Chairman, but the Chairman of the Board of Directors made the announcement about the Share Purchase Agreement and defended it by stating that it is an operational issue and as such, there was no requirement to disclose it to the Cabinet or to the Public Accounts Enterprise Committee of Parliament. If it is an operational issue, then the Chairman was quite out of place to be speaking to operational issues.

TSTT announced that the Price for the Share Purchase Agreement was $TT 255 M Dollars, while unconfirmed information now surfacing suggests that Board approval was given for $TT 225 M Dollars. In addition, it is alleged that some Board Members were not aware of the additional $TT 30M Dollars which was announced by the Chairman.

Three (3) Cabinet Ministers publicly stated that neither they nor the Cabinet had any knowledge of this Acquisition but the Prime Minister subsequently stated that the Cabinet was aware of it since it was covered in the Strategic Plan which the Cabinet approved. As the Recognised Majority Union, we were privy to a presentation of the Company’s Strategic Plan and nowhere in that Plan was there any mention of any acquisition of Massy by the Company. So we are left to ask why was there such a haste to enter into this Share Purchase Agreement when the Company recently indicated that there was a Facilities Sharing arrangement which would have allowed TSTT to access the same Fibre Facilities and Plant that they have now paid Millions of dollars for.

The Prime Minister stated that there is no Micro Managing at TSTT, but a NON Executive Chairman says that he is speaking on Operational issues. This is contrary to the Board’s mandate which is to deal with Governance, Policy and Strategic initiatives. So who is really “Communicating the Truth”?


We verily believe that there is a bigger picture and there is an “End Game” for somebody in this transaction because it is our very knowledgeable understanding that Massy Holdings has expressed an interest in acquiring the majority Shareholding at TSTT. It is also public knowledge that Cable and Wireless must sell their 49% Shareholding in TSTT because of their acquisition of Columbus Communications. 

Ø Is this a similar corporate acquisition like that of Cable and Wireless and Columbus Communications, where the vendor (John Malone) ended up as the Majority Shareholder of the Purchaser, (Cable & Wireless), as stated earlier? 

Ø Was the Massy Holdings Group or any of their key operatives major Financiers of the PNM in the last National General Election? 

Ø Was the appointment of the new TSTT Chairman the facilitative process for this strange relationship between TSTT and Massy? 

Ø Is this a holding strategy to accomplish one of Massy’s key business strategies which is the pursuit of growth in all Sectors locally, regionally and in the Latin American Territories? 

Ø Is it that Massy Holdings is now positioning itself to leverage on its regional presence to make a Play for a Telecommunications presence in the Caribbean Region, which would certainly lead to growth in all sectors regionally? 

Ø Is this acquisition the precursor to the realisation of Massy Communications stated vision of being leader in next generation technology in the telecommunications industry? Remember that their vision statement is: “Where Next is Now.” 

So is the next move the purchase of the 49% Cable & Wireless Shareholding since they have now initiated this deal? 

Ø Why did the Prime Minister publicly support his alleged personal friend, Mr. Elias and publicly belittle and embarrass his Cabinet Ministers? 

Ø Is it that these Cabinet Ministers do not understand what they are approving at Cabinet meetings, since the PM stated that the Cabinet gave approval to TSTT’s Strategic Plan, but others say they did not know anything about any acquisition? 

Ø What exactly would TSTT acquire from Massy Communications in this strange Share Purchase Agreement since they already have a Facilities Sharing arrangement to have access to Massy Fibre Facilities? 

Ø What will become of the Human Resources at Massy Communications? 

Ø What will be the status of those duplicated Jobs in TSTT and Massy Communications and by extension, what will become of the workers who occupies those Jobs? 
It is also public knowledge that this sale has been postponed on some four (4) occasions by the Telecommunications Authority, TATT, and the National Enterprise Limited, NEL, the latest deadline date for this sale to be concluded being June 30, 2017. 

So in the face of this new deadline, all of a sudden and out of the blues, TSTT has announced this Share Purchase Agreement with Massy Communications. 

We find it very curious that this Transaction was hustled through just before the deadline date for the sale of the 49% Shareholding in TSTT, which Massy Holdings Ltd., the parent Company of Massy Communications, has expressed an interest in purchasing.


There are a lot of unanswered questions relative to this development, but the CWU, consistent with its stated mandate to “Communicate the Truth’, is seeking answers to these questions. This is only the first in a series of publications that we believe are absolutely essential as we Dare to Struggle and Communicate the Truth.

We call on the Chairman of TSTT, the CEO of TSTT and the Prime Minister to “Speak Truth to Power”, “Communicate the Truth” and enlighten the public about this situation since they seem to be the only ones who have intricate details about this troubling Share Purchase Agreement.

We await some Public Answers. For this we “Dare to Struggle”. A word to the Wise is sufficient.

Joseph Remy
Secretary General


posted 15 May 2017, 06:23 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 15 May 2017, 06:28 ]

The following statement was issued by Haig Community United on 2017/05/13. It was signed by Eugene A. Reynald, Secretary/Director, Haig Community United

Image result for TRINIDAD GUAVE ROAD FARMERS1. This Press release is issued by Haig Community United (HCU) and relates to its High Court Action seeking justice in its claims to lands at Guave Road in Chaguaramas and compensation resulting from acts of genocide committed against its members by the CDA (Chaguaramas Development Authority).

2. At the invitation of the State, on the 10th May 2017 three representatives of HCU went to the offices of the CDA to discuss a settlement agreement relative to the High Court action HCU brought against the CDA. HCU is on record in the Court as representing the farmers in the HCA.

3. We listened for a while and then had to intervene in order to understand the direction in which the meeting was being taken. When it became clear that the organisers had an agenda that was completely different to the one they communicated to us, we took our leave…but not before explaining in some detail why we were doing so.

4. We went to the meeting in good faith – despite the fact that it was called in defiance of a process of Arbitration advised on by Justice Seepersad at the last Court Hearing of the 7th March 2017 and supported by both the CDA and HCU.

5. We at HCU recommended Arbitration more than one year ago and made arrangements for having a retired Judge (one of repute and agreed to by Justice Seepersad and representatives of the State and CDA) to be the Arbitrator. We at HCU also went to the extent of drafting an Arbitration Agreement to initiate the process but persons at the highest levels of Government who we know, chose - even then, to defy our efforts to initiate the Court recommended Arbitration process.

6. On the day after the aborted meeting we submitted a six page letter to all the parties involved. Among the recipients were Stuart Young, Faris Al Rawi and Dr. Keith Rowley. The letter recorded what took place - particularly the fact it was all set up and proceeded with in defiance of what the State, HCU and Justice Seepersad agreed to.

7. We further advise as follows:

a. The Guave Road farmers (GRF) are the only occupants on lands at Chaguaramas who have a legal claim to ownership of lands in the Peninsular. All other occupants are lessees of the CDA and most of these got their leases by way of nepotism/cronyism or some preferential arrangement.

b. Despite these rights the GRF have been subjected to genocidal assaults by Tewarie and Danny Solomon during the UNC Regime and are now getting similar treatment with clear signs that this could quite easily escalate to genocidal ones.

c. The Government is refusing to compensate the farmers for the loss and expense they suffered - and are still suffering - as a result of such acts of genocide. In a naked attempt at coercion and blackmail the Government is also making vague promises of land to the farmers but only if the farmers give up their legal rights regarding compensation.

The Government unashamedly hold to these positions despite the fact that they know the genocidal acts of the State were illegal and that the farmers currently have employees of CDA in Court on criminal charges related to these illegal acts of genocide.
Image result for TRINIDAD GUAVE ROAD FARMERSIn effect the Government is being oppressive, cruel and knowingly wasteful of public funds in pursuing an illegal course of action against farmers from whom they have taken everything (four have died since this started) leaving them with little option but to fight.

d. To summarise: our claims for compensation are based on facts which were not denied by the UNC (United National Congress) nor are they today denied by the CDA – neither in Court or elsewhere.

The refusal to pay our claims for compensation is “argued for” on the basis of bullying, coercion and tyranny only by those in Cabinet. It is not supported by a single affidavit or reasoned argument put forward by Cabinet or its Attorneys Michael Quamina and Douglas Mendes. And you can bet your life that the real villains in all of this will not come forward…but will continue to hide behind hit men who posture as Attorneys.

e. This recent experience and on-going tyranny by the State has told us that we at HCU will not get fair and just treatment from the majority of those eight or so Ministers – including Rowley and Young, who in May 2015 marched with us from West Mall to Chaguaramas in support of our claims.

f. Our Members have mandated us to continue insisting that Cabinet follows the Law, the recommendations of Justice Seepersad and what the CDA and the State agreed to in Court before Justice Seepersad. With the exercise of a little integrity and intelligence, this process can deliver on Justice within one month and save the public considerable legal and other costs.

g. There is benefit and Justice to all citizens – and not just a few, if the aforementioned is agreed to. We therefore seek the support of all fair minded, patriotic and intelligent citizens in our struggle to have Cabinet observe the Law by firstly correcting their past breaches of it and thereafter ensuring they observe it in going forward.


posted 22 Mar 2017, 05:28 by Gerry Kangalee

The following statement was issued by the Secretary General of the Communication Workers' Union, Comrade Joseph Remy on March 17th 2017

The Communication Workers' Union has carefully noted the statements of the Honourable Prime Minister, Dr. Keith Rowley relative to the Government’s decision to dissolve the Tourism Development Company, TDC, which decision has now placed the jobs of some one hundred and fifteen (115) committed professional workers in jeopardy and has brought about the consequential social and economic challenges for their families.

The Prime Minister has stated that he leads the Cabinet which took the decision to close the TDC and to call on him to fire the Minister because the Minister did it is not to understand what is happening. The Prime Minister also stated that the decision to close the company was not made ’out—of-the-blue". Therefore, the Prime Minister as the head of the Cabinet must take full responsibility for any decision that his Government makes.

The Prime Minister made these statements in response to the Union's call for the removal of the Minister of Tourism for her disrespect to the TDC workers, the CWU and the Trade Union Movement after she made a phone call to the head of the Union almost at the same time that she was preparing to make the public announcement, at the weekly Post- Cabinet Media briefing, that the Government's decided to dissolve the TDC.

The Union would continue to state the irrefutable fact that the Minister NEVER CONSULTED with the CWU as the legitimate RMU for those TDC workers before she proceeded to make a public statement misleading the nation by saying that she held discussions with the President of the Union before the announcement was made, giving the impression that there was prior consultation before the decision was made.

We wish to posit that the Prime Minister, as the head of the Cabinet, must accept full responsibility for this faux-pas and act of disrespect. As such, the CWU is now holding the Prime Minister fully responsible for the mayhem that the Government has created for these workers, who are loyal, dedicated and patriotic citizens of Trinidad and Tobago.

We are holding the Prime Minister responsible for one of the most blatant breaches of the provisions of the Industrial Relations Act, Section 40, which mandates that the employer is duty bound to meet and treat in good faith with any Union which has Recognized Majority Union Status in an Organization/Enterprise; we are holding the Prime Minister responsible for knowing all along, since June 2016, as he stated, that there was a report which recommended that the TDC be dissolved but this information was not communicated to the CWU as the Recognized Majority

Union at the TDC neither were they invited to meet and treat in good faith.

We would like to ask whether the Prime Minister consulted with two (2) former Trade Union Leaders who now sit in his Cabinet and who would be engrossed with the knowledge that Section 40 of the IRA mandates a particular approach to deal with situations like this. In addition, the Prime Minister could have called on his Minister in his Office who has a wealth of knowledge in such matters in his former incarnation practising before the Industrial Court. We are convinced that the Cabinet had the requisite resources available to advise and guide them through this process.

We are really left to wonder, who provided leadership to the neophyte Minister of Tourism to advise and/or instruct her to commit such a fundamental breach of the IRA and of good and proper Industrial Relations Practices.

Every time one of the Cabinet Ministers speak on this issue, the more we are left to believe that this was a deliberate act of disrespect for the Trade Union Movement, and as such, the entire Movement was well within its right to suspend its participation in the National Tripartite Advisory Council until this misdemeanour and fundamental breach are addressed. Contrary to the Prime Minister’s recent statement, we wish to remind him that with much pomp and fanfare, the NTAC was launched by him and there was an expressed mandate for the NTAC to be proactive and deal with critical issues that would have brought stability to the Industrial Relations Environment in the country.

The decision to dissolve the TDC is one such issue. It is curious that the Prime Minister made reference to some report in the Chamber of Commerce newsletter, the "Contact”, about $200M wastage at the TDC, as the Chamber is only one partner in the Tripartite process. This sounds like a case of  “who pays the piper calls the tune".

Finally, we wish to correct the Prime Minister and advise him that this is not the first instance of a problem relative to Non-Consultation with the Labour Representatives on the NTAC before a critical decision was announced publicly. We would never forget the Minister of Finance's public utterances at an IMF function where he made the snide and discourteous public announcement about the famous 0% x 0% x 0% Wage offer to Public Sector workers.

As such, we are convinced more than ever that these statements were clearly articulated by the Prime Minister to “Play Smart with foolishness”. The CWU made a public commitment to "Communicate the Truth" and that we vow to continue to do.

1-10 of 310