RHA WORKERS MUST BEWARE OF POLITICAL GAMES
Monthly paid employees of the Regional Health Authorities have been operating under growing pressure, not having enjoyed a wage increase since 2010. These workers are not represented by a recognised majority union and, therefore, do not have a collective agreement with their employers.
Over the years the practice has been that the Regional Health Authorities would apply whatever percentage increase has been negotiated between the Chief Personnel Officer and the union representing public servants. RHA employees are not public servants and are not covered by the term and conditions enjoyed by public servants. While the RHAs have applied the wage increases, they are not legally obligated to do so.
There have been many rumours that the RHAs are reluctant to apply the 14% increase recently negotiated on behalf of public servants and this naturally has caused great unease among RHA employees. More than four months have gone by yet the RHAs have not said if or when the salary increase will be paid.
The National Health Workers Union (NHWU) has learned that the North Central Regional Health Authority and the Eastern Regional Health Authority have issued memoranda to their respective staffs claiming to have begun preparatory work to facilitate the implementation of the increase.
We, therefore, fully expect those RHAs to institute the increase expeditiously and further call upon the South West Regional Health Authority, the Tobago Health Authority and the North West Regional Health Authority to announce that they are following suit. We, further, expect all the RHAs to announce the dates of payment of the increase.
The NHWU will tolerate no delaying tactics on the part of the RHAs and will take whatever action is necessary to ensure that employees of the RHAs are treated in a just and fair manner.
The National Health Workers Union cautions RHA employees not to be suckered into becoming pawns in a cynical political game which is scheduled to take place on Monday 13th July under the pretext of calling upon the Minister of Health to sign some bogus agreement to pay the salary increase.
Let us be clear: no collective agreement has been negotiated on behalf of the monthly paid employees of any of the RHAs. The Minister of Health, therefore, cannot sign a non-existent agreement.
Even if, the monthly paid workers of the RHAs were the beneficiaries of a collective agreement negotiated on their behalf by a recognised majority union, the Minister of Health would not be authorised to sign that collective agreement. He has no standing in the matter. The representatives of the individual RHAs would be the correct persons to sign.
The NHWU, again, warns health workers to be wary of the game scheduled to be played out on Monday July 13th which is designed to fool them and members of the public into believing that their wage increase is dependent on a script prepared by one politician seeking to return to office and another seeking to join the ranks of political hustlers whose only concern is to eat a food at the expense of public funds. To be forewarned is to be forearmed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sylvan Wilson, Executive Officer National Workers Union 758 8933
1. Haig Community United also called the Guave Road Farmers Association is an NGO formed by the Farmers and was represented by Mr Colvin Blaize and Mr Farai Hove Masaisai of Hove & Associates, Attorneys-at-Law. The CDA was represented by Douglas Mendes SC.
2. The matter was the hearing of an Injunction brought by the Farmers to restrain the Chaguaramas Development Company from destroying crops and property belonging to the Farmers, arresting and assaulting the Farmers and carrying out Development Works on lands in and around Guave Road which the farmers have been working for more than sixty years. The issue of stopping the on going stripping of the Guave Road lands of its valuable top soil and transporting it to areas outside of Chaguaramas in what clearly is a commercial operation was also raised but was not entertained by the Judge.
3. The Injunction was an interim measure pending the hearing of the substantive action in which the Farmers are claiming possessory title to the land by way of adverse possession. Their claim is they have been in possession and control of the lands since the 1950s and in support of this, have produced aerial photography and expert professional evidence going back to this period and submitted affidavits from several persons. They have several other affidavits from persons who were actually farming in the 1960’s and items of evidence which support their claim. Their claim for possessory title does not need all of this evidence so what they have is more than sufficient support for what they seek.
4. The CDA to date have produced no evidence in support of their claim of ownership – and indeed there is evidence to support the fact that their development of lands in Chaguaramas is not being carried out legally or by way of any due process. The farmers are also challenging the CDA’s ownership rights to the land but the Judge was not inclined to hear such during the Injunction.
5. The Court ordered that written submissions be filed with regard to the interim applications made for the injunction and the matter would be heard and a decision made on the injunction on the 29th day of July 2015.
6. A procedural point was raised by Senior Counsel Mendes who stated that the NGO did not have Locus to represent their members. According to the Honourable Justice Frank Seepersad the NGO “Haig Community United” also called the Guave Road Farmers Association was only recently formed and registered as a legal entity and could not alone represent the interest of the Farmers. He ordered that the Claim be amended and all 16 farmers be named as claimants in this matter against the CDA.
7. The Judge refused to restrain the CDA from carrying out its ongoing destruction of the land and the Attorneys for the other side refused to advise his Client to provide such an undertaking. The decision of the Court has therefore allowed an organisation that has not proved its ownership rights to the land to strip and destroy what is considered to be the best agricultural lands in the country. Despite submissions by Learned Counsel for the Farmers that the ongoing destruction of the lands in Chagaramas by the CDA would render any possible decision by the Court in Favour of the farmers useless as the destruction would be irreversible. Heedless of this the Judge adjourned the matter to the 29th day of July despite the Application for the injunction being filed on the 15th day of June 2015 and time being of the essence to prevent the irreversible destruction of the land and the ongoing suffering and loss of the farmers, their families and their communities.
8. The matter is to come up for hearing again on the 29th July and until then the CDA can continue doing what they are doing on the land and to the farmers even though it may turn out that the lands do not belong to the CDA and/or the farmers rights to the lands are upheld in a subsequent matter.
9. If that takes place the actions of the CDA and those directing its agenda will have to be considered crimes and farmers will have to be substantially compensated in several ways by the taxpaying citizens of Trinidad and Tobago – and may very well end up much better off than if they are left on the land. There will also be no one held responsible for the unnecessary expenditure of public money in compensation payments, the destruction of the best agricultural lands in the country, the crimes that will have been committed against the farmers by persons in the CDA including praedial larceny of their crops, larceny of their belongings, the loss of food to the public, untold loss and destruction to communities in the West, etc.
10. Of course despite all the aforementioned and much more, the Law and the CDA’s Lawyer will be satisfied that they have done their respective jobs well and several private sector parties will again have enriched themselves at the expense of the national interest, the Exchequer and the public patrimony.
11. The farmers are not happy with the Orders of the Court or with the procedures it is insisting should be followed. An Appeal can be launched but that will result in further time being given to the CDA to continue with its “activities” - who it should be noted, have not yet proven to the Court that it is acting legally.
12. The obvious conclusion from all the aforementioned is that the farmers are being disadvantaged in all areas and the interest of the State and its citizens are being put at risk in several respects.
13. Justice Must Not Just be Done but Must Also be Seen to Be Done.
THE FYZABAD FIASCO EXPLAINED
In that statement we said: “many trade union leaders have abandoned the first principles of trade unionism: class solidarity, mass organisation, collective action, organizational democracy and political education. Instead they have taken the road of collaboration with the employers, the capitalists and the “eat a food, skin up to the highest bidder” politicians in suppressing the aspirations and the interests of their members.
Many trade union leaders have abandoned the route of self reliance and independent organisation and have attached themselves to the gangs of confidence tricksters and political hustlers masquerading as political parties in order to advance their personal interests.”
What was the jhanjat at Fyzabad about? Was it about differences in strategy to defeat the growing curse of contract labour that is destroying the prospects of workers in the public service, the state enterprise sector, the statutory authorities sector, the health sector and increasingly in the private sector and which is being used to emasculate unions, particularly the PSA?
Was the conflict on June 19th based on differences over how to tackle the growing privatisation/divestment policy of the government which is putting public funds into private purses and reducing the workforce in the public and state enterprise sectors?
Was it about how to counter the aggression of the employers in their open attack on workers as exemplified in the TCL strike and the mass dismissal of NP workers?
The increasing decibel level in the labour movement has nothing to do with ideology or strategy! It is all about labour leaders currying favour with politicians by using the Unions and workers as collateral for bargaining in pursuit of their personal gain.
The Fyzabad fiasco was about some trade union leaders assisting the employers and the political parties in dividing the working class in exchange for a seat in the House or the Senate and for an opportunity to hobnob with those who oppress their members.
Our partisan political system is based on dividing the masses along ethnic, religious and regional lines and trade union leaders who eagerly embrace this corrupt and rotten system are conscious or unconscious agents of the employers and the government. Take note: Messrs. Lambert, Abdulah, Duke, Anisette, Indarsingh, Roget, Maharaj! Today some cling to the PNM yesterday it was UNC, but say what, yesterday was yesterday and today is today. Some ally themselves with whoever is in government, though they may have been allied with the defeated party before!
While many trade union leaders seek the holy grail of political office, the ability of the unions they lead to perform basic trade union tasks has plummeted disastrously. While they spout divisive and dangerous partisan political rhetoric, they are inefficient, pay no attention to properly training their officers, do no research and are ignorant of industrial relations laws and practices.
They have failed to train Union officers, shop stewards and labour officers to efficiently handle disputes at the various levels, have become an embarrassment, are treated with derision and have become the butt of jokes in industrial relations circles.
They love to talk about issues of which they do not have a clue, make unfulfilled promises and have become TV and radio talk show trade union leaders. They do not interact with their members, do not encourage discussion and debate, fear criticism and refuse to practise self-criticism. They have no confidence in their members, are insecure in their positions, run the unions like their personal estates, never consult the workers and lead the union from the top down. They do not encourage the practice of democracy.
The National Workers Union believes that the very survival of the trade union movement rests in the hands of the younger cohort of shop floor/workplace leaders. These shop stewards and branch officers in the day to day functioning of the unions are the more important than the trade union bureaucrats who sit in their fancy offices, drive their fancy cars and make deals with corrupt politicians and employers in order to advance their personal interests.
The workplace leaders of the unions must ask themselves the question why do we tolerate the nonsense that passes for leadership in our unions? Why do we knowingly allow our leaders to engage in practices that are inimical to workers’ interest and do not put a stop to them? Why are we content to allow leaders to operate, free of the checks and balances that exist in the constitution of most unions?
It is time to wake up. It is time that workplace union leaders assume their responsibility to their members to take charge of their unions and to ensure that they operate as they were meant to operate – as institutions designed to defend, protect and advance the interests of the working class and not as watchmen for the employers and the State
ELEVATOR WOES AT SANDO GENERAL HOSPITAL
There are four elevators located at what is commonly called the “Old Hospital” all of which have been giving problems within recent times. The NHWU has been reliably informed that the service contractor RBP Lifts is owed considerable sums of money so that necessary repairs are on hold.
One of the four lifts is dedicated to the kitchen for the movement of food and only one (1) of the remaining three is working. On Saturday 20th June, a patient in advanced labour was dropped off at the hospital, not even at the Casualty Department. A Registered Nurse and a Nursing Assistant recognized the urgency of the situation, immediately placed the patient into a wheelchair and attempted to use the lift which would have taken them closest to the Maternity ward, only to find out that it was not working.
They then had to wheel her down the entire length of the hospital to access the only functional lift. After getting to the third floor they had to wheel her back up the length of the hospital to where the Maternity ward is located. While on the way the baby was born. It is fortunate for mother and child that because of the experience and competence of the staff present this did not turn out to be a tragedy. The NHWU compliments the hospital staff for their dedication to duty, competence and compassion.
However, health care continues to be a political football whereby the government and the Minister of Health are more concerned with turning sod and building new facilities while existing ones are literally going to the dogs.
The incinerator at SFGH is also constantly mal-functioning. This is critical in the disposal of bio hazardous waste; a few months ago the entire “New Hospital” (not the Teaching Hospital) was without air conditioning for weeks including operating theatres. This state of affairs cannot be allowed to continue. The NHWU calls on the Minister to get off the TV and do the job for which he is paid.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sylvan Wilson, Executive Officer National Workers Union 758 8933
The National Workers Union (NWU) and its affiliate the National Health Workers Union (NHWU) join with the working people of T&T in celebrating the seventy eighth anniversary of the 1937 anti-colonial general strike and insurrection which gave birth to the trade union movement and paved the way for independence.
While working people have much to celebrate, we must be clear that the rights and entitlements that we enjoy were not given to us by the employers, the capitalists and the government; they were won through hard, sometimes bloody struggles. Some workers lost their livelihoods, their families, their freedom and even their lives so that the rest of us could enjoy a decent quality of life if not a decent standard of living.
While we celebrate this June 19th, there is a profound sense of unease enveloping the organised workers movement that the hard won rights and freedoms that we have are under severe and constant attack by the employers, the capitalists and their enforcers in the government.
Since the structural adjustment programme inflicted upon us by the International Monetary Fund in the late 1980’s and gleefully implemented by successive governments, the trade union movement has been in retreat.
Since 2008 the NWU has been pointing out that many trade union leaders have abandoned the first principles of trade unionism - class solidarity, mass organisation, collective action, organisational democracy and political education. Instead they have taken the road of collaboration with the employers, the capitalists and the “eat a food, skin up to the highest bidder” politicians in suppressing the aspirations and the interests of their members.
Many trade union leaders have abandoned the route of self reliance and independent organisation and have attached themselves to the gangs of confidence tricksters and political hustlers masquerading as political parties in order to advance their personal interests
The employers no longer treat the trade union movement with respect. They laugh at us as we carry out their programme of attacking each other and dividing the working class. They understand that as long as we refuse to rely on our own efforts to build a powerful, democratic, educated, trained and efficient labour movement, we will remain tools of the employers and lap dogs of the political prostitutes in and out of office.
Our leaders seem to have forgotten that the strength of the labour movement is our power over production and our ability to mobilise large numbers of workers to take collective action to advance, protect and defend our interests.
Mobilisation no longer involves going to the workers, informing them and engaging with them in discussion and dialogue in order to seek clarity and to unite around an agreed plan of action. Mobilisation now seems to be about press conferences, sound bites on the TV, and trade union leaders bigging up themselves.
Trade union leaders seem to fear their members. This has resulted in power in the unions being shifted away from the shop floor, from the hands of the shop stewards and branch officers into the hands of bureaucrats at head office.
Trade union leaders no longer command the respect of the masses of working people and the poor. Trade unionists are being seen as opportunist bottom feeders, like lawyers or insurance agents, who are not prepared to sacrifice for the good of their members; who do not have the intestinal fortitude to face up to the power of the employers and the state and to hold the course despite the pressures they may have to endure. Even when trade union leaders were disliked they were respected. This is no longer the case.
We are going into a period of a long election campaign which is designed to divide the working class along the lines of ethnicity, religion and regional lines. After the dust clears, while there may be a different gang of looters of the public purse in place, the working people and the trade union movement will be in the same position they are in today.
Elections don’t disturb the power structure. The power of capital cannot be voted out of existence. It must be dismantled root and branch. Only the organised power of the working class has that potential.
We repeat a statement we made in 2013: “The task is not to sneak in to the neo-colonial parliament on the backs of one or the other corrupt, capitalist-financed political party but to patiently build a mass movement through working class education, agitation and direct action. When such a movement is built and entrenches itself among the masses, the question of power will become a live issue.”
The trade union movement has the capacity through the deployment of the power of numbers acting collectively and in solidarity and through its power over production, to ensure whichever party forms the government it cannot afford to ignore the demands of the working people.
Trade union membership has been shrinking over time. One estimate suggests that just 16% of the labour force is unionised today. Organising the unorganised is the essential task facing the trade union movement. Hundreds of thousands of workers have no experience of union organisation. If we do not organise them, they will weaken the potential power of the working class and they may be used against the organised trade union movement.
Short term contract labour has taken over the public service and the health sector. The RHA’s exploit workers mercilessly through the use of short term contracts married to an appraisal policy that encourages discrimination and victimisation and is designed to perpetuate a master and servant relationship.
Workplaces are dominated by casual and temporary workers; and young and not so young workers are grievously advantaged under the guise of being OJT’s. Domestic workers are still discriminated against in law; the Industrial Relations Act is still in place; it still takes years to gain a recognition certificate and all political parties are committed to the neo-liberal policy of international capital of wage suppression, deregulation, the dismantling of the public service and privatisation. Elections will not change that reality!
Comrades, we have a lot of work to do, but the capacity to do so can only be built by democratising the trade union movement, developing attitudes and structures where the voice of the rank and file holds sway and their concerns acted upon.
We must see it as our duty to participate in our own affairs in the branches, the General Councils, the Conferences and the Cossabos and we must appreciate that the union is not the president or general secretary. The trade union is I, You, We all together. How strong and organised the labour movement is, is more important than who wins the next election.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)
TRADE UNIONS MUST UNITE TO DEFEAT IRA AMENDMENT BILL
The National Workers Union (NWU) congratulates the National Trade Union Centre (NATUC) for the firm and unyielding stand it took in demanding that the government withdraw the Industrial Relations Amendment Bill, which the NWU alerted the nation the government is seeking to pass on Wednesday 20th May.
The NWU further salutes Senator James Lambert, the President of NATUC and the leader of the largest trade union in the country and a government senator, for taking a clear position that he is prepared to place the interests of the working class above his partisan interest.
The NWU urges NATUC to ensure that the members of their constituent unions are fully informed about the consequences of the Bill. We urge that they be brought into the discussion as to how to defeat the Bill if the government ignores the call of NATUC and the call of the Federation of Independent Trade Unions and NGOs (FITUN) to withdraw the Bill and instead seek to consult with the trade unions and other stakeholders before another step in the process is taken.
We, therefore, call on NATUC to encourage its constituent unions to attend the Conference of Shop Stewards and Branch Officers (COSSABO) organised for Monday 25th May at OWTU headquarters in San Fernando.
It is only by presenting a united front and pursuing a common strategy to defeat the Bill that the government will realise that the trade union movement is prepared to move heaven and earth to defend its interests against the naked attack on the very existence of the movement contained in the Bill.
It is noteworthy that the government is prepared to hold its hand on the Cyber Crime Bill at the behest of the Publishers and Broadcasters Association which represents the interests of the media conglomerates, but is quite prepared to treat the urgings of the trade union movement with disdain and scorn.
Far from putting workers at the centre of development as they promised in 2010, the ruling party has privileged the interests of themselves, their financiers, transnational energy corporations and capitalist conglomerates.
The trade union movement in particular and the working class as a whole must learn the lesson that no one will advance, protect and defend their interests but themselves.
WITHDRAW THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL NOW!
ONE UNION, ONE STRUGGLE! ALL UNIONS DO BATTLE!
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)
IRA AMENDMENT BILL MUST NOT BE PASSED WITHOUT CONSULTATION!
Information has come to the National Workers Union (NWU) that the government intends to pass the Industrial Relations Amendment Bill in Parliament on Wednesday May 20th, even in the face of strident protestations from the trade union movement.
The government, it seems, is determined to pass the bill and hustle it into the Senate regardless of the views of those whom the Bill directly affects; even if it means varying the clauses that require a three fourths majority, which it does not have; even if it means steam rolling the deliberate procedures which usually apply when debating and enacting laws.
The track record of the government, when examined, reveals that they do not care about consulting those whom their policies and programmes directly affect and that they have no compunction about ambushing the population with measures which have never been discussed. One only has to remember the infamous Section 34 and the attempt to sneak into the law the notorious run off proposal which the constitution commission never discussed and which they are coming with again.
The attitude of the politicians in power fits into a tradition of authoritarianism and bullying that has prevailed since independence in the relationship between politicians and the labour movement. In 1965, the then Eric Williams administration declared a state of emergency in County Caroni and on the same day introduced the Industrial Stabilisation Act which went through all its stages in both the House and the Senate in twenty four hours and was proclaimed two days later. The Industrial Stabilisation Act, among other things, outlawed strikes.
In 1972 the Eric Williams administration, enacted the Industrial Relations Act during a state of emergency when some trade union leaders were in detention. This law, among other things, severely restricted workers ability to join a trade union of their choice. Of course consultation was out during a state of emergency.
The government, therefore, is continuing the long-standing tradition of trampling upon the interests of the people and adopting an attitude that the only things that count are those which serve the personal, sectoral and class interests of the politicians and their paymasters and the devil take the hindmost when it comes to the interest of working people.
The National Workers Union calls upon the leadership of the trade union movement to demand that the government cease all efforts to pass this bill so that the leadership of the trade union movement can make a rigorous analysis of the bill and consult with its membership through the Conference of Shop Stewards and Branch Officers (COSSABO) scheduled for Monday 25th May.
The National Workers Union urges the leadership of the trade union movement to quickly ramp up its mobilisation efforts to resist the government’s attempt to impose its distorted and perverted agenda on the workers under the guise of dealing with the Workers Agenda, which they ignored for five years. Instead of putting the workers at the centre of development we are being pushed to the sidelines to be further exploited and browbeaten by the employers. We will have no more of it!
One Movement! One Struggle! All unions do battle!
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)
It is cause for great suspicion that five weeks before parliament is to be dissolved, this bill has come up for debate. For more than thirty years the trade union movement has been submitting its views on the amendment and or/repeal of the Industrial Relations Act, which we have always viewed as being an anti-worker act designed to serve the interest of employers and to keep the working class “in its place.”
It is worthy of note that the first piece of anti-labour legislation, the Industrial Stabilisation Act of 1965, was rushed through all its stages in one day in Parliament by the Eric Williams administration. This Act prohibited strikes and was designed to serve the interests of foreign capital which was being sought through the industrialisation by invitation initiative.
In 1972, the Industrial Relations Act replaced the Industrial Stabilisation Act. It was enacted during a state of emergency by the Eric Williams administration and placed severe restrictions on workers ability to join a trade union of their choice and was designed to stifle the revolutionary mood of the masses which had erupted in 1970.
Today we have yet another attempt by the gatekeepers of the employers to attack the rights of workers and trade unions by including in the Bill a clause which enables a worker who may not even be a member of a union to trigger a process which can lead to the decertification of that union if the union does not effectively represent that worker who pays no dues to the union.
This surely is an attempt to undermine the financial base of unions and make us impotent in our task to defend, advance and protect the interests of the working class. This must be resisted with all the might of the trade union movement. While the Minister of Labour, a renegade trade unionist, babbles about having consulted with the trade union movement, the first time we saw the draft bill was when it was laid in the House on May 1st.
The National Workers Union is in the process of analysing the Bill and will soon publish an in-depth statement. In the meantime we have seen enough to recognise that this Bill if it becomes law will constitute the most serious assault on the labour movement since the 1970’s.
What is striking about these three attempts to repress the trade union movement through legislation is that sell-out trade union leaders have joined with the government to attack the very interests they purport to represent. In 1965, these sell-out artists were led by Carl Tull; in 1972, by Clive Spencer and the leaders of the Labour Congress; today, by Errol McLeod and Rudranath Indarsingh.
The National Workers Union calls
upon Senator James Lambert, leader of the
The National Workers Union calls upon the Labour Movement to convene a Conference of Shop Stewards and Branch officers (COSSABO) as soon as possible, to not only discuss the Bill, but to devise a strategy to defeat this Bill and force the government to withdraw it.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)
On May 8th 2015 the following statement was issued by Joseph Remy, President of the Federation of Independent Trade Unions and NGOs:
The Federation of Independent Trade Unions and Non-Governmental Organizations, FITUN, would like to express its grave concerns with respect to the Bill that was laid in the House of Representatives on Friday 1st May, 2015, by the Minister of Labour, Small and Micro Enterprise Development, to amend the existing Industrial Relations Act, the IRA.
Our preliminary review of the provisions contained within this Bill sends some very worrying signals to FITUN and by extension all Trade Unions within its fold. While we have not had the opportunity to do an in-depth analysis of the entire Bill, we have observed and carefully noted "Part VA" of the Bill whose heading;
"CANCELLATION OF CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION AND OTHER SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO REPRESENT A MEMBER OR WORKER",
is of major concern to us. The provisions contained within this Part, makes it mandatory for a Trade Union to represent a worker, even though that worker refuses to join the Union and pay Union Dues. In essence, this effectively says to workers that they don't have to be a dues paying member of a Union to be given representation by the Recognized Majority Union. We see this as strangling and choking the Unions ability to operate and give effective representation to all its members.
In addition to this provision, "Part VA", gives those same non members of the Union the right to Petition the Industrial Court to seek to have the Trade Union's Certificate of Recognition cancelled if they feel that as non-members, they were not given effective representation.
These new provisions are diametrically opposed to the positions adopted in recent public statements made by the Minister of Labour, Small and Micro Enterprise Development, who, albeit wrongfully, alluded to his Government’s efforts to save three (3) Unions from the threat of the Cancellation of their Certificate of Recognition in 2010, when in fact the attempt to cancel the Certificate of Recognition of those Trade Unions was made in 2009.
In addition, they are totally opposed to the recommendations of the Workers Agenda of 2010.
FITUN has also observed that there are other provisions contained within this Bill which are aimed directly at the heart of the Trade Union Movement. Once again, just as happened when the Industrial Stabilization Act and subsequently the Industrial Relations Acts were enacted, we are seeing an obscene act of collusion between the Government, the Employer Class and Big Business, in collaboration with those reactionary and backward elements of the Trade Union Movement to curtail the progressive march of the Independent Trade Unions.
These provisions, if allowed to become Law, will see the wanton exploitation of workers and the entrenchment of Contract Work in Trinidad and Tobago. Workers would be left more defenceless against the rampaging exploits of unscrupulous Employers who would use every opportunity to exploit and victimize workers’ and disenfranchise the work place democracy that was engendered by the progressive Trade Union Movement.
What is quite disturbing is the fact that as a Federation, we were not consulted on this Draft Bill before it was laid in Parliament. Oh what a shame on those who are supposed to know better! It is also a crying shame that these draconian provisions are perpetrated on workers by those who cosmetically cloaked themselves in the robes of Trade Unionism in the past, but now that they have tasted the seductive cocktail of state power, they have brazenly stripped themselves naked and have exposed their selfishness, greed and treacherous tendencies.
FITUN is calling on all right thinking Trade Unionist to take a stand against this attack on the Trade Union Movement. We demand that this Bill be withdrawn from the Parliament and the Trade Union Movement be allowed the opportunity to examine its provisions, thereafter there must be a period of genuine consultation between all affected parties and interest groups to arrive at a way forward for any amendment to the Industrial Relations Act. We commit to mobilize all workers to mount a strong challenge against this anti-worker and anti-Trade Union Bill.