Where we stand‎ > ‎

Media Releases

These are the Media releases recently issued by the Union and other organisations/people..


posted 5 Dec 2016, 20:59 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 5 Dec 2016, 21:04 ]

ON 2016-12-06, the National Workers Union (NWU) issued the following statement

After all the dancing and the prancing in Caracas, we still know precious little about the gas agreement which was signed by Prime Minister Rowley and President Maduro on Monday. What do we know?

At the post-Cabinet news conference on Thursday, Rowley said that he was going to  “to sign the government to government agreement and the commercial structure which will open the door for commercial exploitation of the Dragon gas field in Venezuela which is to the north of us here, just beyond the Bocas.”

Well, there seems to be two documents that were signed: “the government to government agreement” and the “commercial structure.” The government to government agreement, probably, clears the way for the signing of what Rowley refers to as the “commercial structure.” We are not aware of who signed this latter document and what the contractual obligations of the signature parties are.

The Prime Minister informed us that Shell would be at the signing ceremony so it is

reasonable to assume that Shell would have been one of the parties to have signed the “commercial structure.” This assumption is strengthened by the knowledge that Shell, since its buy out of British Gas, is the largest shareholder in Atlantic LNG, whose business it is to compress and liquefy the natural gas for export.  

This operation hardly adds any locally-accruing value and is no different to when Caribbean slave-driven sugar cane production was exported as molasses – the so-called muscovado bias -which relegated colonial economies to producing unprocessed commodities for export.

According to Rowley Shell is “partnering with Trinidad and Tobago in this exercise” in its capacity as the “owner of pipeline and platform in Trinidad and Tobago which can be considered for utilisation in the entry of/receipt of any gas from Venezuela”. 

If and when this natural gas does come to market it would be interesting to see how it is apportioned between Atlantic LNG and the Point Lisas petrochemical companies who are at this time in a fierce struggle for natural gas supplies and who are putting great pressure on the government from the upstream and downstream sides of the equation to support their respective interests. The two largest shareholders in Atlantic LNG BP and Shell are themselves the leading producers of natural gas.

Who is going to make the capital investment needed to bring the Dragon Field into production? Media reports state that the Venezuelan state-owned PDVSA reckons that four wells need to be drilled and that eventually an offshore platform has to be installed. Then there are pipelines to be run to hook up with Shell’s structures (if that is the intention).

What is the role of the National Gas Company (NGC) in this project? According to its website 

“NGC’s traditional business of compressing, purchasing, transporting and selling natural gas to industry provides over 75 per cent of its revenue stream. The gas aggregation and merchandizing roles have honed the Company’s expertise in natural gas services including, pipeline maintenance and construction and gas transmission and commercial activities.”

In effect what NGC does is purchase the gas from the upstream producers like Shell and BP, transport the gas by NGC-owned and operated pipelines to its subsidiary PPGPL which extracts the associated natural gas liquids like propane, butane and natural gasoline from the gas and through its pipeline network delivers cleaner residue gas to the downstream customers. Will NGC have any input in the development of the Dragon project except to receive gas from Shell (if that is the intention), and play its accustomed role as mid-stream distributor?

When will the project begin? How long will it take for first gas to be delivered? How much gas is expected to come from Dragon over what time period? How would the so-called gas curtailments affecting downstream producers be impacted? What kind of pricing arrangements have been worked out with the Venezuelans? What is the government’ take in the absence of revenue streams from royalties and production sharing contracts.

The National Workers Union calls upon the Rowley Administration to provide answers to the many questions raised so that the citizen of Trinidad and Tobago may have a clear idea as to whether the Dragon deal will benefit them and not just fatten the pockets of transnational corporations and become yet another instance of the people of Trinidad and Tobago providing corporate subsidies to transnational corporations.


Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)


posted 9 Nov 2016, 09:31 by Gerry Kangalee

Image result for IMBERTOn November 6th 2016, the Federation of Independent Trade unions and NGOs (FITUN) issued the following statement.

The Federation of Independent Trade Unions and Non-Governmental Organisations, FITUN, demands that the Minister of Finance, Mr. Colm Imbert, immediately issue an unconditional apology to the Trade Union Movement, the National Tripartite Advisory Council (NTAC), all workers and all dispossessed and poverty stricken citizens of Trinidad and Tobago for his disrespectful, disingenuous, ill-conceived and ill-spoken comments that he made at an IMF Forum on Wednesday of this week.

In addition, we demand that the Minister exercise communication restraint where issues of the Free and Fair Collective Bargaining Process is concerned since his utterances violated the International Labour Organisation ILO, Conventions, #87 and #98, which speaks to Freedom of Association and the Protection of the Right to Organize and of the Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining.

With respect to the emergency meeting of the NTAC which was held last Friday afternoon, FITUN did indicate that we are still committed to the process since we are aware of the current economic challenges that the Country faces and as such we supported some of the ideas proposed to move the tripartite process forward. But we were adamant that the Minister must unconditionally publicly apologize for his statements.

We did indicate that we were not in agreement that he was misquoted, misunderstood or misrepresented. We made it quite clear that the Minister misspoke and exposed his hidden IMF Agenda and in those circumstances, he must humble himself and unconditionally publicly apologize. We are therefore demanding that he should be disengaged from the NTAC since he has compromised the integrity of the Council and remains unapologetic for his disingenuous statements.

For the records, FITUN agreed to be part of the National Tripartite Advisory Council, since we believe that the process of Tripartism is a fundamental pillar around which any modem Society can organize its socio-economic policies to ensure some degree of social stability. In addition, we are cognizant of the severe economic challenges that the country is facing which we are convinced beyond any doubt, were not the making or doing of the workers of this country.

For years we have been articulating that the neo-liberal socio-economic model that successive Governments have followed has caused us to be in this unholy mess that we are currently facing. Notwithstanding our diametrically opposed ideological views and our evidenced based arguments against this model, we are mindful of our responsibility to ensure that the workers that we represent and the communities that we operate within are at least provided with a decent standard of living, that their rights are protected and that they benefit from the natural resources of the country in a fair and equitable manner, consistent with the provisions of our Constitution.

As such, we took strong offence to the Ministers statement which was made in a forum held by the major proponents of the neo-liberal agenda, the International Monetary Fund, IMF. His obscene reference to Wage Restraint and his flippant statement alluding to the fact that he has raised Fuel prices and there were no riots and as such he is looking at raising it again since all that workers and their unions would do is to hold placards with his name and picture and wave it during protest demonstrations are clear indications of his Government’s intention to institute harsh austerity measures under the dictates of the IMF.

We are convinced that this is a strategy to force the Trade Unions to abandon the Tripartite process and leave the Government with the freedom and the unfettered right to institute harsh austerity measures consistent with the IMF dictates. We have identified the deceptive tactic and as such we would not be side-tracked from our mission to ensure that the working class and less possessed and disadvantaged citizens would not be saddled with the burden of adjustment in these challenging economic times.

If that was not a deliberate tactic, then the Minister committed a serious act of deception and disingenuousness, which the Prime Minister must immediately address since he can cause further embarrassment to the Government and by extension the Country.

In these circumstances if the Minister fails to heed to our legitimate request, the Prime Minister must do the honourable thing and disengage the Minister from this very important and critical forum. The issue of trust is a fundamental pillar around which Tripartism would succeed, and in the face of this blatant, unapologetic breach of trust by the Minister, his further participation in this process could only cause further distraction, contamination and the failure of the NTAC to deliver on its mandate.


posted 3 Nov 2016, 00:00 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 3 Nov 2016, 00:05 ]

On 2016-11-03 the National Workers Union (NWU) issued the following statement

It is not surprising that the government has adopted, just like the last government, a policy of wage suppression. It is ironic that the Finance minister let the cat out of the bag at an IMF conference in Port of Spain. 

It has been clear for those who have eyes to see, that the government has adopted the position, like many capitalist governments across the globe, that the working people must be made to pay for the persistent crisis of the global economy that has worsened since the financial collapse of 2008. 

Prime Minister Rowley has on several occasions claimed that government policy has been based on the need to avoid “going to the IMF” One news article (December 22nd 2015) states: “Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley wants to ensure his Government does not have to govern ­under ­International Monetary Fund (IMF) conditionalities. Speaking during an interview with I95FM yesterday, Rowley said the Government wanted to avoid “the final option, where decisions are made for you by the lender of last resort. We don't want that at all”.

He told Parliament on April 8 2016: “I will do everything that is required to ensure that this country does not end up in the arms of the IMF again.” On April 10 2016, he is cited as saying “every citizen will have to sacrifice in some way, including becoming more fuel conscious, and this “medicine” was necessary to keep the country out of the “arms” of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)...I have given a commitment to this country and I want to give it again to the population. As leader of this Government, as leader of Trinidad and Tobago’s business, I will do everything that is required to ensure that this country does not end up in the arms of the IMF.”

In September 2016 he stated: “priority number one is to ensure that we do not end up with an IMF programme, meaning we have mis-managed our affairs and we end up at the lender of last resort,”

Yet the IMF has been in the country since April, giving instructions to the government, according to the Finance Minister: “on a number of pressing matters” including to “determine an appropriate oil and gas fiscal regime in the current environment of low oil prices and declining production in our oil and gas fields.” The IMF, according to Imbert, is also assisting in disaggregating the Heritage and Stabilisation Fund.

Therefore, the government in an effort to keep us away from an IMF standby programme is implementing all the measures the IMF would have imposed. An IMF programme is being implemented even though no loans have been made by the IMF

The wage suppression policy is part of a package of measures that is designed to ensure that the so-called burden of the economic crisis lies squarely on the shoulders of working people and the poor. It follows the extending of VAT on thousands of items, the increases in fuel prices, the job losses in the public sector, the reduction of social welfare programmes and the speeding up of divestment/privatisation of state enterprises.

Other measures propagated by the IMF include:

Fiscal policy discipline, with avoidance of large fiscal deficits relative to GDP;

Redirection of public spending away from subsidies directed toward pro-poor services like primary education, healthcare and infrastructure investment;

Competitive exchange rates (currency depreciation)

Liberalization of inward foreign direct investment;

Whether we are in an IMF standby programme or not, we are being force fed the bitter medicine with more to come.

The National Workers Union urges working people to be aware of the danger to their quality of life being posed by the austerity measures that have already been inflicted upon us and to make it clear to the political and economic elites that they will resist these measures including government’s attempt to suppress wages.

The National Workers Union calls upon unionised workers to insist that the leaders of the trade union movement abandon the policy of sucking up to the very politicians that are leading the attack on the standard of living of working people and the poor.


posted 22 Sep 2016, 11:59 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 22 Sep 2016, 12:06 ]

On 2016-09-22, the National Workers union issued the following statement.

The National Workers Union is clear that the government of Trinidad and Tobago is actively working against the interests of working people and the poor as it moves to secure the interests of those sectors in the society which have a vested interest in maintaining and increasing inequality and exploitation.

Addressing BPTT's Statistical Review forum in Port of Spain on Thursday September 15th, BP Trinidad and Tobago President Norman Christie, the most powerful economic player in the country, made the most significant political statement for the last few years.

Christie warned the country that efforts to update the nation's gas master plan "must result in clear policy decisions regarding matters such as gas allocation and price and must incentivize upstream investments in an increasingly competitive environment."

...Failure to bring clarity to these matters quickly will result in a sharp decline in investments, which will lead to a repeat of the circumstances that have materially contributed to the natural gas supply and demand imbalance that we are currently experiencing; only it will be worse," he said.

He went on to say "The next phase of planned major developments...are still not sanctioned and will not be sanctioned unless policy decisions properly recognize the context in which we are operating."

He then threatened to withdraw BP’s planned US $5 billion of investment over the next three to four years into natural gas projects, if the transnational corporation does not have its way. In other words, BP has no qualms about undermining and destroying the economy of T&T if the government does not bow to its demand for further concessions on top of those that ex-Energy Minister Ramnarine is so proud of boasting that the UNC government gave them.

Image result for norman christie
Norman Christie
BPTT is the largest producer of gas in Trinidad and Tobago and a major stakeholder in all four trains of Atlantic LNG. It is the largest contributor to government revenue and to the foreign exchange earnings of the country. The international energy sector is in crisis and BP is moving to ensure that T&T pays for the crisis and not BPTT.

How does the Prime Minister respond to this threat? With deathly silence! Not a word! After all the transnational corporations are untouchable!

There are billions of dollars in outstanding taxes that are not being collected. There is a serious land grab taking place with ex-Caroni lands and in Chaguaramas. There is obscene bias and inequity in the allocation of the precious foreign exchange, the vast majority of which emanates from the energy sector, and, therefore, belongs to all the people of T&T. There is a never-ending spiral of the cost of living, of food and pharmaceuticals are particularly hard hit.

What does the Prime Minister say about these oppressive and exploitative practices that are bleeding working people and the poor? Not a word! After all, the politicians, who are no more than enforcers for the ruling elites, cannot afford to alienate their financiers.

What does he talk about instead!? He is threatening to retrench public sector workers - police, fire officers, prison officers, health care personnel and those whose negotiations have not yet been settled, like T&TEC workers. The IMF must be rubbing its hands in glee. This is not surprising. It is classical neo-liberal medicine to ensure that working people and the poor are forced to pay for the capitalist crisis.

Mr. Rowley is irritated that workers are demanding their retroactive payments - a debt that is due to them, having already sold their labour power for wages that they have not yet received. If you get your retroactive, the goodly gentleman thunders, you may be out of a job. Actually, the intention is to reduce the size of the public sector anyway, backpay or no backpay.

The most vulnerable sector in the Prime Minister’s gun sights are the thousands of health care personnel who are not protected by a recognised majority union; unlike police, prison and fire officers. It is clear that the gloves are off!

What is pathetic about the whole affair is that trade union leaders continue to spout verbiage about “social partners” and MOU's and are calling on the government to tackle the economic crisis by ensuring that the proverbial “burden” is shared “equitably.” It's like telling a vampire that it must eat rice instead of drinking blood.

Two days after the PM made it clear that he has lined up the working class on the chopping block, two (or is it three?) Trade Union federations met with him and gushed about how fruitful the talks were. They were hopeful that if the government takes the lead in developing a “national consensus” the burden of adjustment would be shared equitably and the ruling elites would be expected to carry their "fair" share. What absolute rubbish! It's like telling a bandit just thief less now so that you could keep on thiefin' for a longer period.

The National Workers Union is quite aware that we are in the midst of a raging class struggle and no amount of appeals to the consciences of the ruling elites are going to cut it. They are moving to secure their pound of flesh and that flesh is being cut from our backsides.

The National Workers Union urges working people to defend the little that we have by exercising our power in such a way that if they do not back off it is going to hurt them. Our power is the power over production and the potential power to put numbers in the streets.

The National Workers Union calls upon the organised workers to put pressure on their trade union leaders to stop playing hansy pansy with the employers, the ruling elites and their political enforcers and to organise their resources to push back against the assault on the living standards of working people and the poor by utilising the power of the people against the people in power, both economic and political.


Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)

WHERE WE STAND: birdsong response to Guardian editorial of 2016/09/03

posted 6 Sep 2016, 08:03 by Gerry Kangalee

The following statement was issued by birdsong on September 5th 2016.

birdsong acknowledges with the deepest gratitude the widespread outpourings of support for our cause that have been aired in both the conventional and social media in response to our recent eviction from the premises that we have occupied for the last 28 years.

We are particularly thankful to the editors in the conventional media houses who have seen it fit to give prominence to the underlying issues of the absence of a viable public policy framework to support the efforts of the cultural community and in particular the long standing problems of security of tenure for the steel band.

Even in recording our gratitude and appreciation, we must take strenuous exception to the inaccuracies vented in the Guardian editorial of Saturday September O3, 2016. Of particular concern is the position taken by the newspaper’s editor that, “in the face of ultimately being displaced or possibly having to purchase the existing panyard or some other property, the leadership of the band is said to have raised $l20,000" - a sum which, the editor dismissively describes as being "quite insignificant”.

Apart from being grossly inaccurate, these assertions convey the clear impression that the birdsong organization has been deliberately lazy and incompetent in its efforts to deal with the land tenure challenge which has been responsible for the demise of several steel bands in our country’s history. In order to correct this inaccuracy, we present the following 10 facts about the situation in which 
birdsong now finds itself. 

The facts are as follows:

l. Contrary to the assertions of the Guardian’s editor, birdsong’s major challenge is not the availability of resources to acquire a new site but the many externally imposed delays that have affected each stage of the land acquisition. The result is that today, after making a $120,000 down-payment 6 years ago on January 12, 2010 and securing approval for loan financing, we are unable to conclude the transaction and take possession of the property due to the failure of the relevant state agencies to appoint Registrar· of Friendly Societies who, according to the law, is the only office holder empowered to dispose of the assets of a defunct friendly society.

2. In the meantime, we have completed conceptual designs, obtained outline permission from the Town & Country Planning Division to develop the property, secured mortgage financing and prepaid more than one year’s instalments even though the approved mortgage has not yet been able to be executed.

3. birdsong is a socially responsible, self-sustaining, community-based, not-for-profit organization. Self-sufficiency is at the core of our value system and, as such, it is not a feature of our DNA to seek, negotiate or beg for handouts, special favours or sponsorship arrangements from fairy godparents in the political or commercial arenas. It is on the basis of this philosophy, that we have dutifully avoided the adoption of the sponsorship model that has become a standard feature of the resource mobilization strategy of the Steelband movement. Instead, as a deliberate policy choice, we have been developing and testing a business model that is both 
relevant to the needs of our community and supportive of our mission of continuously challenging the boundaries of steel pan innovation in music, music education and self-sustainability. We are essentially a self-sponsored cultural entity.

4. The "birdsong model" involves 2 incorporated commercial entities operating as a social enterprise and an incorporated music education and performing arm. So far, this model has served both our organization and our community well » we employ 60 persons on a full time basis and 15 experienced music teachers on a part time basis. Our trained corps of workers allows us to be the only steel baud to successfully bid for service contracts in the Carnival space. Our business ventures finance our core activities and our special projects have received support from a range of local and international agencies including the UNDP, the IDB, the JB Fernandez Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation and United Way. Our business entities are fully compliant with all relevant regulatory requirements. We maintain annually audited accounts and are up to date on all statutory payments, including income tax and VAT, national insurance, workmen’s compensation and public liability insurance. We owe nobody.

5. A defining feature of our business operations is that our directors receive no remuneration and all profits from our social enterprises contribute to the maintenance and development of our music education and performance operations including:

— The funding of our scholarship programme which supports graduates of our academy in the pursuit of tertiary education at universities in the US and Europe.

— Payment of tutors, purchase of instruments payment of registration fees for exams - all at no cost to our students.

6. The decision to seek mortgage financing for our proposed land acquisition is a matter of deliberate strategy which reflects, among other things, the strength of our balance sheet and, above all, the confidence that the financial sector reposes in our business model, viability prospects and management systems and processes.

7. Efforts to find a sustainable solution to the insecurity of tenure pre-date the landlord’s legal initiatives to regain possession. Indeed, our records show that we have beau engaging successive past Ministers of Culture on this issue from as far back as April 1986 when the Hon. Muriel Donawa-Mc Davidson was the relevant line minister.

8. It is precisely because of the apathy, indifference and tokenism that has characterized past political and bureaucratic responses to our efforts that we took the decision, in the immediate aftermath of the landlord’s initiation of legal action, to seek to establish our social enterprises and to acquire a suitable property on the open market, with the full confidence that our limited means at the time was not a constraint on us achieving any targets that we set for ourselves.

9. In the face of the landlord’s rejection of repeated purchase offers, subsequent attempts to acquire land focused on a property which is owned by a defunct friendly society. When we made our first offer to purchase this property, the value, based on the opinion of professional valuators, was of the order of $300,000. However, due to a combination of systemic inefficiencies and no small measure of bureaucratic ineptitude, it took a full 5 years before we were able to make a down- payment in 2010 by which time the market value had quadrupled to $1.2 million.

10. Effectively, 12 of the 20 years that have elapsed since the landlord’s initial legal action have been spent attempting to close a simple land purchase transaction that, in the normal course of business, ought to have been concluded in 3 months birdsong remains undaunted by the events of the past weeks. Rather, we are particularly pleased that the eviction has opened up the national conversation on pan, the role of community-based organizations and the systems for supporting education in the arts.

Inspired by the example of Servol in forging indigenous solutions to gaps in the social and educational support systems, we are encouraged by the emerging prospect of a partnership with UWI and UTT to develop a community-based prep-university music education programme to be replicated in other communities. We are determined to emerge from this crisis unruffled and committed to breathe new life into the description of the Steelband movement so artfully articulated by David Rudder - “out of a muddy pond, ten thousand flowers bloom"!


posted 12 Aug 2016, 09:13 by Gerry Kangalee

The Communication Workers' Union (CWU) would like to advise the national community that they should not be misled by the Figures that have been displayed by TSTT in the Company's Annual Financial Statements.

The Company has reported that they have recorded a loss of $316M for the Financial Year 2015-2016. If this massive figure is taken at face value, it would send the chilling signal that the Company is operating at a loss and as such is not a viable state entity. Well, we want to "Communicate the Truth" as we usually do.

Truth be told, the Company effectively recorded an After Tax Profit of over $500 Million Dollars. When we carefully examined the figures, we realised that the Company made an allocation of $575M for writing off obsolete technology equipment that they have in operation.

To quote the Chairman of the Board of Directors in his message accompanying the Statements: "During the next two years, our capital investments will be predominantly focused on both our wired and wireless broadband technology, and represents a significant allocation of the approved $3.7 Billion spend. Given this strategy, we undertook a comprehensive re-evaluation of our existing technology. This interrogation resulted in an Impairment charge of $375M and an accelerated depreciation charge of $200M. "

As you all can see, and I quote the Chairman once again: "Notwithstanding that the Company's other normal operations were profitable during the financial year, this re-evaluation cost of $575M negatively impacted our financial performance whereby TSTT recorded an after-tax loss of $316M." The CWU is concerned about the misleading signals that the statements can portray in the public domain, particularly in the face of the Government's pathetic weeping about their lack of Finances.

We are well aware that TSTT is one of the State Enterprises that has been the subject of interrogation by the Government appointed Committee to review the performance of State Enterprises. We are also aware that there is still the pending sale of the 49% Shareholding that Cable and Wireless has in TSTT, which the NEL has taken on the responsibility for, and we are well aware that the Prime Minister has publicly expressed his concerns about TSTT"s profitability.

The CWU believes that these statements can have the deliberate effect of coercing the Government to place TSTT on the chopping block to satisfy their public wailing for funds to run the country. In addition, this can facilitate those Private Mercenaries, either local and foreign, who have lined up to get their hands and pockets entrenched in TSTT whereby they would milk the Company and the Country of our patrimony.

TSTT is the only indigenous Full Service Telecommunications Service Provider in the Region, it is a profitable and viable State Entity, and in the face of the current abuse by the other providers, FLOW’s most recent announcement of a rate increase is a perfect example, TSTT must be allowed to flourish and demonstrate true Patriotism in the lucrative Telecommunications/ICT Sector.

The CWU vows to speak out on such issues of national importance to ensure that citizens have a major stake in the Telecommunications/ICT Sector. This Sector has provided in the past and will continue to provide in future an avenue for the facilitation of the long overdue and absolutely necessary diversification of our Economy.

We vow to ensure that the working-class and less possessed in society are not trampled upon in this crazy free-market and capitalist driven economic system that continues to make fewer people richer and billions poorer.

For that we will always Dare to Struggle!


posted 22 Jul 2016, 07:17 by Gerry Kangalee

The Minister of Labour Jennifer Baptiste-Primus has made it clear that that her role is that of consultant to the employers relating to their industrial relations obligations and not, as was generally believed, to be a conciliator and guide as to procedure in industrial relations matters.

The Minister, according to newspaper reports advised employers at a Rotary function to consider implementing “agreed wage freezes, pay cuts, decreased work hours, temporary lay-offs, reduced benefits, redeployment of employees into other lines of businesses and job-sharing.”

The Minister is giving employers free advice on how best to make workers pay for the capitalist crisis they had no part in creating. This Minister has done nothing to protect steel workers, citizens of this country, from the depredations of Arcelor Mittal. This demonstrates the impotence of government to protect its citizens from foreign corporations and their exploitation of workers; it seems when citizens are workers, they deserve no protection from the state from the exploitative practices of their employers, foreign and domestic.

So here we have a Minister of Labour encouraging wage reductions and inferior benefits as an alternative to retrenchment and mentions nothing of high profits being reduced and reductions in obscenely high management salaries and bonuses, nor of tax evasion, money laundering, capital flight and corrupt practices.

If this is the advice being given to employers, then the National Workers Union warns all workers in the public sector, including at state enterprises and statutory authorities, that they have to move quickly to defend themselves seeing that the government is the biggest employer in the country and would certainly pay close attention to the advice of its Minister.

Unionised workers in the private sector must ensure that their union leaderships are prepared to struggle with all the resources available to them to defend their hard-won rights and obligations. Already Massy Pres-T-Con has proposed a wage freeze to the Transport and Industrial Workers Union. Non-Unionised workers in the private sector must move quickly to organise themselves into unions to give themselves a fighting chance to survive the onslaught of the employers.

The National Workers Union calls upon trade union leaderships to mobilise workers to fight back against this growing assault. In order to show commitment to ensuring workers benefits and entitlements are not devastated, trade union leaderships should withdraw from all the pappy show advisory boards and committees that are designed as permanent talk shops and that constrict the debates and struggles to behind closed doors and not where they belong - on the workplaces and in the streets.


Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)


posted 28 Jun 2016, 23:47 by Gerry Kangalee



The National Workers Union (NWU) notes with concern Finance Minister Imbert’s statement in the Senate on June 28th 2016 that 50% of the backpay owed to certain categories of public sector workers, including monthly paid employees of the RHAs, should be paid “within a day or two.”

The government has persisted in treating this issue that is of great concern to health care workers in such a cavalier, contemptuous fashion that it has become a festering sore. The National Workers Union is constrained to point out that these arrears go back to 2011 and represent monies already worked for and that in these times of economic stress, workers are fed up of being jerked around by fancy talking politicians who seem to be clueless as to how to lead the country out of the quicksand.

The Minister of Finance, after several months of silence, announced in his April midyear budget review that workers will get half their retroactive payments by the end of June (another date in the long line of promised dates) and the other half in government bonds at the end of September or in two instalments at unspecified dates in 2017. The position of the National Workers Union was then, and remains so now, that the workers should be paid all their arrears in cash.

Mr. Imbert’s statement is more interesting for what it obscures rather than for what it reveals. He has not named a date for the payment of the other fifty percent which, he had said, would be paid either in government bonds at the end of September or in two tranches in 2017.

There has been no concluded agreement with the Public sector unions involved that if bonds are to be accepted what the conditions applying to these bonds would be such as maturity date and interest rates. If the government imposes and not negotiates these terms with the public sector unions involved, it would be acting in an illegal, unethical and dictatorial fashion and the public sector unions will surely resist. Health sector workers are not represented by a recognised majority union and are forced to accept whatever the government decides.

The National Workers Union calls on the Minister of Finance to meet government’s obligations to the workers in full by the end of June.

The National Workers Union calls upon the managements of the five RHAs to avoid creating chaos among workers who are to receive their part payment by providing them with detailed documentation which would show how the retroactive payments were broken down. This would serve to reveal the inevitable calculation errors that will arise and allow workers to have those errors corrected. These documents, ideally, should be distributed to the workers before payment

These detailed statements should include: the amount of each and every increase in benefits that is to be applied and for each respective year and a breakdown of sums calculated for each benefit for each year for each employee.


Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer. Cell: 785-7637)


posted 23 Jun 2016, 12:50 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 24 Jun 2016, 07:07 ]

The National Workers Union issued the following statement dated 2016/06/23:



The National Workers Union warns the working people of Trinidad and Tobago that if they do not intervene with all the muscle at their command, they are going to be forced to bear more burdens than they already bear as the international Monetary Fund (IMF) recommends more austerity measures to the government.

The IMF has outlined the measures they recommend the government of Trinidad and Tobago take to deal with the economic crisis. These measures are contained in a press release issued on June 20th 2016 and arise from the Article IV Consultation carried out on May 6th. It should be noted that IMF personnel have been entrenched in the Ministry of Finance for some time now.

The IMF claims that the T&T currency is grossly overvalued and has stated that its Directors have recommended “greater exchange rate flexibility” through “a careful adjustment strategy.” This is just a fancy way of saying that the IMF recommends that the T&T currency be devalued. By saying it is “grossly” overvalued; the IMF is suggesting a massive devaluation and by talking of a “careful adjustment strategy” it is warning the government not to do a one and done devaluation, but to devalue by increments, for fear of provoking  resistance from working people and the poor.

Because we import nearly everything we consume, devaluation is going to hit working people and the poor where it hurts most – in our pockets, because the cost of most goods and services is going to become even more expensive than they now are.

The IMF argues that so-called exchange rate flexibility should be part of a “comprehensive demand-management package.” What this means is that demand for goods and services should be suppressed; that working people and the poor should have less disposable outcome and this would decrease the demand for foreign exchange to be spent on everyday goods and services.

As part of this so-called demand management package, the IMF that “priority should be given to broadening the revenue base with a comprehensive VAT reform...” Not content with devaluation as part of their demand management recommendation, the IMF urges the government to increase the tax burden on working people and the poor through the Value Added tax.

Another measure recommended by the IMF that would send the cost of living skyrocketing further is the phasing out of fuel subsidies, a measure which the PNM government has already begun to implement.

The IMF further recommends “strong comprehensive structural reforms...” and emphasises the “importance of pushing ahead with energy sector taxation reforms”. The IMF is supporting the international energy giants that squat offshore in their quest to adjust the Supplemental Petroleum Tax (SPT) to reduce the tax liability of the energy corporations. This, of course, will mean less revenue for the State and less foreign exchange coming into the system. They go on to talk about “addressing inefficiencies in the public service”, which is IMF-speak for the reduction of personnel in the public service and the health service, which has already begun with the ongoing attack on contract workers and daily paid casual and temporary workers.

It is clear that the IMF is ideologically committed to inflicting austerity measures on working people and the poor. It is clear that the government of T&T is committed to implementing over time the recommendations of the IMF, even in the absence of an IMF standby arrangement.

The National Workers Union calls on working people and the poor to make it clear to the government that they will not bow down meekly and accept this back breaking austerity programme that just makes the rich richer and takes away the little that working people and the poor have.

The National Workers Union calls on the leaders of the trade union movement to stop flirting and fooling around with governments made up of politicians who have pawned their souls to capitalist financiers and get down to the task of informing and educating the members of their unions about the very real threat to the quality of life of themselves and their families for generations to come.

The National Workers Union calls on trade union leaders to engage in serious, sustained mobilisation of their members and the community to devise methods to beat back the threat by the power of our numbers and the power over production so that the business elites do not crush the interests of working people and the poor by forcing them to bear the burden of an economic crisis they had no part in making.


Gerry Kangalee (National Education and Research Officer.  Cell: 785-7637)


posted 18 Jun 2016, 19:53 by Gerry Kangalee   [ updated 18 Jun 2016, 20:07 ]



 The National Workers Union (NWU) issued the following statement on June 19th 2016. 

June 19th 2016 finds the working class is under severe pressure. The capitalists, employers and the State are adopting measures to force working people and the poor pay for the economic crisis brought about by the collapse of the price of oil and natural gas and the resultant drying up of the foreign exchange which is the lifeblood of our colonial economy. They call it sharing the burden and some of us support their call. 

The problem is that the whole burden has been placed on the backs of the working people. The big shots, the billionaires and their enforcers in the government are doing fine, while we suffer the slings and arrows of retrenchment, wage freeze, higher prices for food and pharmaceuticals and a crippling VAT burden.

The employers, including the government, have embarked on an orgy of retrenchment. While transnational corporations and local enterprises have sent home thousands of workers, the government has eagerly jumped into the arena and are getting rid of contract workers and temporary and casual daily paid workers. The government, bypassing the collective bargaining process, has unilaterally imposed by decree how public sector workers must access their arrears – their own money

BP, the largest of the oil-sucking vampires, is seeking to renegotiate its contract with NGC and the Atlantic Train One contract, so that they could get a bigger slice of the revenue at the expense of the treasury. Foreign onshore energy firms are calling for changes to the Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is proposing that the Supplemental Petroleum Tax (SPT) be amended to reduce the tax liability of the energy corporations. The IMF has taken charge of the Ministry of Finance and is preparing the way for further privatisation and for a massive devaluation

Five employer organisations have produced a document stating that “every employee must have unfettered access to the law and the freedom to associate as they see fit, including the right to represent themselves.”

It also says that individual workers must have “the right to determine their own individual terms and conditions of employment.” and that “many non-unionized businesses already provide a fair and equitable work environment for employees...Employees in such businesses should have the ability to access employment rights and remedies without having to join a trade union.”

The Employers’ Consultative Association (ECA) has proposed that the definition of employer be changed to “protect” small and micro enterprises “from the impracticality of what can sometimes be exacting standards, with respect to unfair dismissal claims and trade disputes”. So no “good industrial relations practice” if you work for a small employer; 

  • if an employer has less than 20 workers, there should be no right to collective bargaining; 
  • unions should be de-recognised in workplaces where the number of members falls below twenty (20); 
  • a worker/union found guilty of illegal industrial action should pay the employer for lost profits; 
  • employers should have the right to unfairly dismiss workers if they have been employed for less than a year. We can now anticipate
  • probationary periods being extended from three months to 364 days; 
  • “fees” be introduced to process matters. So they can dismiss you, take away your wages and then expect you to pay for processing a claim for unfair dismissal; 
  • the amount of compensation that the court awards should be limited. They quote Barbados which is limited to five weeks pay for workers with less than two (2) years service. 

While the employers are closing ranks and seizing the opportunity to intensify the class struggle and step up the attacks on the rights, benefits and entitlements of workers, many trade union leaders continue to engage in divisive behaviour and seem more concerned with their personal self-interest than with defending and protecting the working class.

It is ludicrous that we have NATUC and FITUN and now we have JTUM in a dogfight with one other, scrambling and snarling to get the favours of a government which has taken the lead in piling on the pressure on their members by raising taxes, allowing the merchants to increase prices at will and sending home hundreds of contract workers.

In the midst of this carnage some trade union leaders are still calling for consultation, complaining about non-implementation of the toothless Memorandum of Understanding and tripartite approaches as if they do not understand that we are involved in a vicious class struggle, the outcome of which will determine our quality of life for years to come. There is no relief from those who profit from our misery. There is no way the capitalists are going to share anything – unless they are forced to do so! We cannot hide from the reality of the class struggle!

There is need for a massive fight back against this ongoing assault by the employers, the capitalists and the State. The French working class is showing the way. They are fighting tooth and nail to defeat the austerity measures inflicted by their government. If we want the laws relative to severance changed; if we want the laws restricting the right to strike changed; if we want the laws governing recognition of trade unions changed; if we want the Workers Agenda implemented, it is not good enough to simply call for the changing of those laws. We must be prepared to bring all our power to bear on those who can change the laws.

We must engage in a sustained campaign of mass mobilisation not only of our members but also the unorganised working people. Mobilisation cannot be done through the media. The workers must be involved at the branch, workplace, mass membership meeting, COSSABO and community levels.

The implications of the assault by the capitalist class must be discussed thoroughly with the members and the community and guidance must be sought from them as to what they are prepared to do to bring a halt to this growing attack. We must look at the lessons of 1989, when we stopped the then government in its tracks with the General Strike of March 6th (Day of Resistance)







1-10 of 293